InformAction Forums

Code: Select all

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha.js"></script><div id="recaptcha_widget_div" style="display:none"></div><script>Recaptcha.widget = Recaptcha.$("recaptcha_widget_div"); Recaptcha.challenge_callback();</script>

Code: Select all

Giorgio sorry but I write in Italian to the first, partly because I speak as a layman in the matter and therefore it becomes difficult to express in English, which by the way I do not speak very well.

It often happens that some sites recall JS RECAPTCHA on google.com, type this here:

Code:
    Add your business now src="http://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha.js"> </ script> <div id = "recaptcha_widget_div" style = "display: none "> </ div> <script> Recaptcha.widget = Recaptcha. $ (" recaptcha_widget_div "); Recaptcha.challenge_callback (); </ script>



As in all browsers good or bad this thing is not a problem in FireFox yes.

The operation in practice is the cause (or certainly one of the causes, if there were others) that generates the famous white WYCIWYG redirect to the page, which in fact does not show more than the page you wanted.

First RECAPTCHA lay on RECAPTCHA.NET (starting in your whitelist) and you could just block that site, even momentarily, now I'm on GOOGLE.COM.

If you block the JS GOOGLE.COM the problem actually no longer occurs, but those JS should be kept open, why are so many sites that use it for a variety of functions and a few sites that cause problems you can not disable google.com .

I do not know why some sites call it the JS, I'm not a web programmer and I do not think neither the place, nor to discuss the case, however, reading here and there on the net, it seems that it would be enough to write a little 'better than some codes and you could avoid this problem. But as often happens, the test sites on IE on FF.

Even if, every time you find a site that has this problem should contact its webmaster, explain the problem, make themselves understood in English and hope that the type in question understand and resolve, but as time goes by? And we are sure that we would listen?

Sometimes a drastic solution, even if objectively less orthodox, is the fastest and functional.

If it were possible to add a block (temporary / permanent, as for the other items of NoScript) to redirect to WYCIWYG or RECAPTCHA for the site we are visiting?
It would be much more functional, practical and linked to the only site in question, and then letting the vision of all the other sites, absolutely clean.

In theory you could temporarily block the JS to google.com, but not all of JS google.com giving problems, but only the call to the Recaptcha, so if there was a site that uses both what other JS on google. com, then it would be equally unwatchable. Blocking only the RECAPTCHA / WYCIWYG seems the most practical and painless.

You are able to implement such a function? I think with the preparation that you think should not be difficult or bad?

Clear the cache, cookies, create a new [url=http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile]profile[/url], with and without add-ons, modifications and any different no effect, is the only block of JS google.com source and prevent the call with the consequent redirection. : Roll:

A page that gives me problems is this (and all the pages SPECS any other product reviewed on this site), but not necessarily create the same problem at all, as in the previous testimonials:

http://www.dpreview.com/products/nikon/slrs/nikon_d600/specification

In case you did not give problems I can only confirm that evidently the page SPECS (unlike all other options) recalls something which then generates the whole.

I hope to answer me, I will keep an eye on this topic.

Hello and thank you: mrgreen:

FF 3.5.19 - Win XP SP3 - Vista SP2