ebul positivlist

General discussion about the NoScript extension for Firefox
Post Reply
fka
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 12:28 pm

ebul positivlist

Post by fka »

Noscript is one great piece of software, that in advance.
But im asking myself why your positive list is so blown up and especially why all the bad google sites are allowed...
I am no expert but imo google is dangerous due to their very suspicious data collection behaviour.
As tons of webpages are using google scripts by loading them externally, google can track me all my way through the internet.
I think that is very critical and maybe you should consider not to place google sites (and others maybe too...) by default in your positivelist...
Again, tyvm for making this great software, imo its by far the most usefull ff plugin!
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100623 Iceweasel/3.5.10 (like Firefox/3.5.10)
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9524
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: ebul positivlist

Post by Giorgio Maone »

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026 Firefox/3.6.12
fka
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: ebul positivlist

Post by fka »

sorry shame on me, i searched in the faq's for positivlist, not for whitelist...
Anyway i would have made that post as it seems you did not had the chain of thought that it is dangerous that someone is able to track you all through the internet...
You say "as trustworthy as google"... don't you think google had shown more than once recently (eg wlan sniffing), that they are absolutly not trustworthy?
Well i don't want to rant around here, this is just to make one think.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100623 Iceweasel/3.5.10 (like Firefox/3.5.10)
Post Reply