possible addon conflict? or user malfunction?

[anotherfacelessone]

Is there a conflict between the addon scriptish (a greasemonkey fork for FF4) and noscript? I was using a script called "instant gallery" (from userscripts.org) via greasemonkey & noscript (scripts disallowed) with no problems. I have recently changed to the scriptish addon with the same script and have noticed that I now need to temporarily allow the site to run the same script. Other GM scripts seem to function ok with scriptish & noscript set to disallow. Is there a difference in the way scriptish applies the script to the page compared to greasemonkey? Is this a change in the way more recent versions of noscript are functioning? Is this a temporary bug in noscript? Is there a work around (something I need to whitelist)? Checking the console provided no clues. Having to temporarily allow sites just to use my script is annoying & potentially unsafe. Thanks for any insight into this.

[Giorgio Maone]

Is there a difference in the way scriptish applies the script to the page compared to greasemonkey?

I suspect it is this.
Could you check whether this script work with NoScript disabled or uninstalled and JavaScript disabled from Firefox's built-in Tools|Options|Content checkbox?

[anotherfacelessone]

First, thank you for taking the time to reply. I did as you asked. I disabled noscript & disabled javascript in FF and the script did not run. Then I enabled javascript in FF & the userscript was functioning normally. Finally, I enabled noscript again, and i had to "temporarily allow" website to let userscript function again. The author of scriptish stated that he added "new tags" to his fork of Greasemonkey. I wonder if his tags are changing how noscript reads the userscripts. I added "file://" to my whitelist but that has not helped. Any other ideas? Thank you for your help.

[Giorgio Maone]

disabled noscript & disabled javascript in FF and the script did not run.

This means that the "new way" of Scriptish requires JavaScript to be enabled on the page, while old GreaseMonkey didn't.
This is a Scriptish limitation which only the Scriptish developers can overcome, if they want.

[anotherfacelessone]

Understood. Thank you for your time.