I've gotten other updates before.Firefox could not install the file at
http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla ... +sm+fn.xpi
because: Invalid file hash (possible download corruption)
-261
Can't Update to Latest (stable?)
Can't Update to Latest (stable?)
I'm using the add-ons window to try and update from 2.0.3.2 to 2.0.3.3 and I get:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_4; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Safari/533.18.5
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9524
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: Can't Update to Latest (stable?)
Try updating manually from http://noscript.net/getit#direct
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10
Re: Can't Update to Latest (stable?)
That worked, thanks. So the one on AMO is corrupt or was it just me?
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_4; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/6.0.472.63 Safari/534.3
Re: Can't Update to Latest (stable?)
It happened again.
I had to use the link you gave me.Invalid file hash (possible download corruption)
-261
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_4; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.41 Safari/534.7
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9524
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: Can't Update to Latest (stable?)
Unfortunately there's always an (usually short) period of time after a new version of an add-on is published at AMO when its security hash and the file itself don't match, because of mirror synchronization and page caching delays.Anonymous Joe wrote:That worked, thanks. So the one on AMO is corrupt or was it just me?
Here's one of the many bug reports about variants of this problem, which I just reopened.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026 Firefox/3.6.12
Re: Can't Update to Latest (stable?)
The time previous to this, the problem persisted for days. This time I didn't bother and used your link.Giorgio Maone wrote:Unfortunately there's always an (usually short) period of time after a new version of an add-on is published at AMO when its security hash and the file itself don't match, because of mirror synchronization and page caching delays.Anonymous Joe wrote:That worked, thanks. So the one on AMO is corrupt or was it just me?
Here's one of the many bug reports about variants of this problem, which I just reopened.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.41 Safari/534.7