fx3.6.3, ns1.9.9.87, new profile, forbid noscript.net, load http://noscript.net/feed
Is the feed view a chrome child doc of the original xml doc? Then I guess this makes sense, still an exception should be made for chrome.
also a minor issue, "Invalid chrome URI: /" message is logged when the NS menu is opened, what does it mean?
[INVALID] docShellJSBlocking=2 breaks feed view
[INVALID] docShellJSBlocking=2 breaks feed view
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9527
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: [INVALID] docShellJSBlocking=2 breaks feed view
Nothing to do about it. The cascading permissions behavior is a Gecko docShells built-in, so you can expect unfixable corner edges and this is one of the reasons this option is not user-facing.al_9x wrote:Is the feed view a chrome child doc of the original xml doc? Then I guess this makes sense, still an exception should be made for chrome.
No idea, it's not a message from NoScript. Probably something somewhere didn't expect the chrome page to be loaded in a scriptless docShell.also a minor issue, "Invalid chrome URI: /" message is logged when the NS menu is opened, what does it mean?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3