Ugh, typically the article has some nonsense in it: incorrect explanation of what the port had to do with the exploit, mixing up hashing and encryption, wrong definition of peer-to-peer…
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; en-US; rv:1.9.3a5pre) Gecko/20100508 Firefox/3.7
dhouwn wrote:Ugh, typically the article has some nonsense in it: incorrect explanation of what the port had to do with the exploit, mixing up hashing and encryption, wrong definition of peer-to-peer…
So, who do you think created it? The Russian Mob? North Korea? China? Gordon Brown?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4