New urls appear to be allowed by default

Ask for help about NoScript, no registration needed to post
aldiboronti
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:42 am

New urls appear to be allowed by default

Post by aldiboronti »

I happened to notice on a board that I regularly use and for which I've had NoScript permissions set for ages that a new one had appeared, something called gumgum.com. What concerned me though is that gumgum was allowed by default. If I hadn't been checking permissions for that page for something else I would have completely missed this newcomer.

Does this mean that you need to constantly check all your permissions for each site to watch out for additions or have I simply missed something in originally setting NoScript up?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/50.0
barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 11141
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: New urls appear to be allowed by default

Post by barbaz »

Have you set "Temporarily allow top-level sites by default" or similar option?

If not, scan your system for malware per General Troubleshooting Instructions #2.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
User avatar
Thrawn
Master Bug Buster
Posts: 3106
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:46 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: New urls appear to be allowed by default

Post by Thrawn »

It's an advertising platform. Besides the possibility of malware, could it be bundled with another extension that you've installed?
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.

True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0
aldiboronti
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:42 am

Re: New urls appear to be allowed by default

Post by aldiboronti »

Checked for malware, none found. But I think I've found the problem. I just checked my whitelist and it was way bigger than I thought. I think what's been happening is that I've been allowing sites and then forgetting to revoke permissions afterwards. Just pruned my whitelist to the essentials. Tell me, if I temporarily allow sites do I have to specifically revoke temporary permissions afterwards or is it done automatically when you leave the page?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/50.0
barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 11141
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: New urls appear to be allowed by default

Post by barbaz »

aldiboronti wrote:Tell me, if I temporarily allow sites do I have to specifically revoke temporary permissions afterwards or is it done automatically when you leave the page?
Temporary permissions automatically expire when the browser is closed or history is cleared.
aldiboronti wrote:I think what's been happening is that I've been allowing sites and then forgetting to revoke permissions afterwards.
Unless you never clear history nor quit/restart your browser, that wouldn't explain it.

Does it require login to reproduce this? -
aldiboronti wrote:I happened to notice on a board that I regularly use and for which I've had NoScript permissions set for ages that a new one had appeared, something called gumgum.com.
If not, link to that board please?
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
Post Reply