Need new default entry in inclusionTypeChecking.exceptions ?

Bug reports and enhancement requests
Post Reply
barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 11109
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Need new default entry in inclusionTypeChecking.exceptions ?

Post by barbaz »

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20852
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20936

both require the same inclusionTypeChecking.exceptions addition

Code: Select all

.animeget.eu/*.jsx
Should that exception be default?
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7972
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: Need new default entry in inclusionTypeChecking.exceptio

Post by therube »

But why default?
Yes are those who will be affected by this, just as they would with any other wrongly coded site, but to default it?

(Better that the websites code things correctly so the issue doesn't come up at all ;-).)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33.1
barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 11109
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: Need new default entry in inclusionTypeChecking.exceptio

Post by barbaz »

I'm thinking because it's apparently a site used by a significant fraction of NoScript users given the number of times we get asked how to make sites work with NoScript where that exception is the solution.

If this is vetoed as a default exception, I think it should be added to the FAQ, where the question is something along the lines of
I can't watch videos on <some anime site> despite allowing everything in the NoScript menu, but disabling NoScript completely gets it working. How can I make it work without disabling NoScript?
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7972
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: Need new default entry in inclusionTypeChecking.exceptio

Post by therube »

Certainly not up to me to "veto" ;-).

Yes, FAQ would be nice.

Even nicer would be a more transparent way for the user to know that something like this has occurred - without needing to frequent the Error Console.

Perhaps the NoScript icon could change to indicate (visually) that something "happened", some condition occurred, that you may want to be aware of. Even page specific & even if for only some set period of time, before (the icon) reverting to "normal". And in situations like this there is nothing apparent that happens, except "the site doesn't work".
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33.1
barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 11109
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: Need new default entry in inclusionTypeChecking.exceptio

Post by barbaz »

therube wrote:Certainly not up to me to "veto" ;-).
Why couldn't it be, if you have good reason?
therube wrote:Even nicer would be a more transparent way for the user to know that something like this has occurred - without needing to frequent the Error Console.

Perhaps the NoScript icon could change to indicate (visually) that something "happened", some condition occurred, that you may want to be aware of. Even page specific & even if for only some set period of time, before (the icon) reverting to "normal". And in situations like this there is nothing apparent that happens, except "the site doesn't work".
That is viewtopic.php?f=10&t=19548 .
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
Post Reply