[BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:10 pm
[BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
Cannot Flashgot link nor Flashgot selection with E10s enabled.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/40.0
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:10 pm
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
Cannot Flashgot selection either.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/40.0
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
Flashgot selection doesn't work here either.
Flashgot link (ctrl+f1) works it was never broken as far as I experienced. I don't use the context menu so I can't comment on that.
Too bad this extension is not maintained anymore...
Flashgot link (ctrl+f1) works it was never broken as far as I experienced. I don't use the context menu so I can't comment on that.
Too bad this extension is not maintained anymore...
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/44.0
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9455
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
FlashGot is maintained. Actually, I'm currently working with Mozilla to ensure that it can be supported as a WebExtension as soon as possible.avada wrote: Too bad this extension is not maintained anymore...
In the meanwhile, if e10s gets enabled in the stable channel before WebExtensions are viable, show-stopping bugs like these will be fixed.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
Update:
So I've been testing with extensions.interposition.enabled;false (which disabled compatibility shims), and flashgot is one of the addons that's totally broken this way.
So I've been testing with extensions.interposition.enabled;false (which disabled compatibility shims), and flashgot is one of the addons that's totally broken this way.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:46.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/46.0
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
Of course. I think Giorgio's comment above should make it clear that FlashGot does not currently work without the compatibility shims, as he has other urgent work, but if it becomes essential (due to e10s being enabled), then he'll take time to fix it.
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/44.0
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
Hmm... What does this mean? I still can't flashgot a selection when e10s is enabled.v 1.5.6.13
=====================================================
+ e10s-compatible API
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/47.0
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
It'd be nice if Flashgot got a bit of attention. For a long-long while now it's: Noscript 100% - Flashgot 0%
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/53.0
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
avada, how do you know this? It can't be based on activity on the forums, because Giorgio wasn't posting in NoScript sections either in the months before NoScript 2.9.5, a major change in NoScript, was made public. And given Giorgio's comment above, it can't be based on release dates either.avada wrote:For a long-long while now it's: Noscript 100% - Flashgot 0%
... but without making it clear how you know for a fact that NoScript has been getting all Giorgio's attention and Flashgot gets none, your comment doesn't look good for you.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
Well, noscript getting releases and FG don't speaks for itself.barbaz wrote:... but without making it clear how you know for a fact that NoScript has been getting all Giorgio's attention and Flashgot gets none
Anyways, FG basically only has one feature broken, "flashgot selection". (But for at least a year and a half.) I suspect getting that working would have took a tiny fraction of an effort compared to a new noscript version. Yet the huge noscript release got precedence.
If you mean it's filled with sadness, then true.barbaz wrote:your comment doesn't look good for you.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/53.0
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
Yep, and what it's saying is, FlashGot-is-being-redone-as-a-WebExtension. Listen closely.avada wrote:Well, noscript getting releases and FG don't speaks for itself
Keep in mind that it's less time-consuming to fix what you've already got than rewrite an entire software for another platform. So generally it's better to just fix the bug. But when A) you're going to be stuck with the rewrite anyway, B) most users don't see the bug, and C) no one is forced to be affected by the bug - guess where you'll put the effort.avada wrote:I suspect getting that working would have took a tiny fraction of an effort compared to a new noscript version. Yet the huge noscript release got precedence.
If it makes you feel happier, we can tell you that Giorgio is helping to design the WebExtensions API.avada wrote:If you mean it's filled with sadness, then true.barbaz wrote:your comment doesn't look good for you.
How does that look for the long-term future of all his extensions?
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
Well, I would have been entirely happy with a hacky, scotchtape fix.barbaz wrote:Keep in mind that it's less time-consuming to fix what you've already got than rewrite an entire software for another platform. So generally it's better to just fix the bug. But when A) you're going to be stuck with the rewrite anyway, B) most users don't see the bug, and C) no one is forced to be affected by the bug - guess where you'll put the effort.
That's cool. Hopefully some Firefox users still remain by the time it's done to use it.barbaz wrote:Yep, and what it's saying is, FlashGot-is-being-redone-as-a-WebExtension. Listen closely.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:53.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/53.0
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
Well, flashgot is good as dead...
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
Do you really think that approach will get this fixed faster? Calling FlashGot "good as dead" after Giorgio wrote "FlashGot is maintained", you see the problem there don't you? It just discourages Giorgio and makes you sound ungrateful for FlashGot. But I think that is not what you're aiming for, as your replies to me say, actually you really appreciate FlashGot and would be sad to see it die.avada wrote:Well, flashgot is good as dead...
So how about working with what Giorgio wrote and using it in your favor? Watch and learn:
_____________________
e10s is now enabled by default in the stable channel for some users - viewtopic.php?f=7&t=22793#p87943Giorgio Maone wrote:In the meanwhile, if e10s gets enabled in the stable channel before WebExtensions are viable, show-stopping bugs like these will be fixed.
... and FlashGot is not yet a WebExtension. Can this bug please be fixed?
Thanks!
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
Re: [BUG][E10s] Cannot Flashgot link with E10s enabled
At this point it doesn't matter. Those quotes are a year old, or older. Flashgot selection doesn't work for 2-3 years now. A bunch of times downloads fail to start when added by to DTA by flashgot.barbaz wrote:Do you really think that approach will get this fixed faster? Calling FlashGot "good as dead" after Giorgio wrote "FlashGot is maintained", you see the problem there don't you? It just discourages Giorgio and makes you sound ungrateful for FlashGot. But I think that is not what you're aiming for, as your replies to me say, actually you really appreciate FlashGot and would be sad to see it die.avada wrote:Well, flashgot is good as dead...
So how about working with what Giorgio wrote and using it in your favor? Watch and learn:
_____________________
e10s is now enabled by default in the stable channel for some users - viewtopic.php?f=7&t=22793#p87943Giorgio Maone wrote:In the meanwhile, if e10s gets enabled in the stable channel before WebExtensions are viable, show-stopping bugs like these will be fixed.
... and FlashGot is not yet a WebExtension. Can this bug please be fixed?
Thanks!
Flashgot has 1/3 of the userbase of noscript, but is an order of a magnitude less complex. But it got about 0% dev time in the past years. Now that the XUL phaseout is near there's no chance for a fix to the addon as it is. Noscript will yet again will take precedence, when porting to webextension. So we might not see a functioning flashgot for a year or two, or never.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0