Page 1 of 1

[Resolved] NoScript regression

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 6:20 am
by rihad
NoScript broke with recent update (ver. 2.6.8.15rc5): it no longer allows JS links to work (temporarily allow top-level sites by default doesn't seem to work), also Flash videos no longer appear within a clickable placeholder.

Iceweasel 24.3.0 (Debian's rebranded Firefox).

Re: NoScript regression

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 7:07 pm
by gus_
Can confirm, 2.6.8.15rc5 noscript build broke a lot of sites for me, also using firefox v24 .

Re: NoScript regression

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 7:11 pm
by therube

Re: NoScript regression

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 7:21 pm
by gus_
Yep sorry, realized there were already a bunch of posts in some of the other forum areas, with suggestions to update build. Got 2.6.8.16rc1 and now things are working fine.

Re: NoScript regression

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:25 pm
by rihad
Thanks, 2.6.8.16rc1 fixed it.

An option to only perform an update when a non-RC version is finally released wouldn't be too bad...

Re: NoScript regression

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:53 pm
by barbaz
rihad wrote:An option to only perform an update when a non-RC version is finally released wouldn't be too bad...
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/noscript/
click the big green "Add to Firefox" button

Re: NoScript regression

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:41 pm
by rihad
barbaz wrote:
rihad wrote:An option to only perform an update when a non-RC version is finally released wouldn't be too bad...
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/noscript/
click the big green "Add to Firefox" button
That's how I installed it initially I think, then it kept upgrading as soon as a newer version got released.
Could it be that I first installed it from noscript.net? I don't really remember. Thanks for the tip.

Re: [Resolved] NoScript regression

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:48 pm
by rihad
I just did what you suggested - installed 2.6.8.14 from mozilla's add-ons site, and here's what noscript.net displayed in a new tab after restart:
Looks like you are running an older version (2.6.8.14), probably because latest version is not published on addons.mozilla.org yet.
You are strongly encouraged to
install latest stable version (2.6.8.15)
Am I right that I shouldn't install from here because then firefox will keep updating to RC releases?

Re: [Resolved] NoScript regression

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:04 pm
by Giorgio Maone
rihad wrote: Am I right that I shouldn't install from here because then firefox will keep updating to RC releases?
No, you're not.
It's not about where you install from, but about the version number format: if it ends with .rc[some number] or .a[some number] or .b[some number], then you go in the beta channel. Otherwise, if the format is just number.number.number.number (1.2.3.4), you're on the stable channel.
An AMO bug, though, apparently switched lots of user on the beta channel with RC5, not sure how yet :(

Re: [Resolved] NoScript regression

Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 6:14 am
by rihad
Ok, thanks, updated to 2.6.8.15 and hoping for the best. Good luck with your investigation :)

Re: [Resolved] NoScript regression

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:18 pm
by barbaz
Giorgio Maone wrote:An AMO bug, though, apparently switched lots of user on the beta channel with RC5, not sure how yet :(
Should the announcement be updated then?

Re: [Resolved] NoScript regression

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 9:50 pm
by Giorgio Maone
barbaz wrote:
Giorgio Maone wrote:An AMO bug, though, apparently switched lots of user on the beta channel with RC5, not sure how yet :(
Should the announcement be updated then?
No it doesn't, actually.
After looking at some stats, I concluded there's no bug but just a lot (more than 100K) users "normally" in the beta channel, who account for the lots of reports.

Re: [Resolved] NoScript regression

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 11:39 pm
by Thrawn
Should noscript.net show a slightly different update message for people on RC builds? Something along the lines of "You're running a development build! Thanks for helping to test NoScript development, please check the forums (before posting) if something goes wrong, here's how to get back to release, etc"