Localization of Noscript halted?
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:32 pm
Is there some reason that the localization of Noscript has been neglected for the latest two releases?
NoScripters and WebSec nerds of all lands, unite!
https://forums.informaction.com/
Code: Select all
<em:locale>content/noscript/en-US/</em:locale>
<!-- LOCALECHROME START -->
<em:locale>locale/ar/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/be-BY/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/bg-BG/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/ca-AD/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/cs-CZ/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/da-DK/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/de-AT/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/de-DE/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/el-GR/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/en-GB/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/es-AR/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/es-ES/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/et-EE/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/fa-IR/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/fi-FI/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/fr-FR/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/gl-ES/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/he-IL/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/hr-HR/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/hu-HU/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/ko-KR/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/id-ID/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/it-IT/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/ja-JP/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/km-KH/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/lt-LT/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/mk-MK/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/nb-NO/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/nl-NL/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/pl-PL/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/pt-BR/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/pt-PT/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/ro-RO/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/ru-RU/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/sk-SK/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/sl-SI/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/sr-YU/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/sv-SE/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/th-TH/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/tr-TR/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/uk-UA/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/vi-VN/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/zh-CN/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/zh-TW/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/cy-GB/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/sr-RS/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/ms-MY/noscript/</em:locale>
<em:locale>locale/kk-KZ/noscript/</em:locale>
<!-- LOCALECHROME STOP -->
As a lead (and also often only) translator for more than 70 addons on babelzilla i can not confirm your arguments.GµårÐïåñ wrote:As a lead (and often only) translator for MANY addons (over 25 of them) on babelzilla I can tell you that their system is extremely unstable and loses content constantly or mutates them improperly which has left me at the begging of the addon developers that I support to go back and REDO the whole thing again from scratch and its a nightmare.
The problem is that the language I support is not as easy to type as people think, so it is VERY time consuming to properly format it and then submit it, so the constant loss of data and mutations are a big huge waste of time. I have formally told my developers that I will get to it when they fix the problem, I cannot go and translate multiple times only to have the work lost, its ridiculous.
This is unfortunately an entirely babelzilla issue and the developers and the translators are ALL innocent bystanders who are becoming collateral damage now.
With all due respect, just because you haven't experienced issues, doesn't mean that there aren't any.sonickydon wrote:As a lead (and also often only) translator for more than 70 addons on babelzilla i can not confirm your arguments.
The only major data loss happened approximately one year ago and even that only affected a mere 5% of the overall work i had done there.
It is true that the system is not perfect in any way.
Developers can always propose changes to the system and i'm sure the babelzilla admins would be happy to implement changes that would facilitate the process.
As to the second part of your statement, as Giorgio has already responded, I will not repeat it since he beat me to it, so just refer to his post. Some developers don't have much respect for the work that goes into translating and can waste your time when its not necessary, it seems Giorgio was more considerate.The main issue however is not the babelzilla-developers relationship but the image of highly popular addons (like noscript) that degrades with partially localized gui's.
Specially for Noscript - a security related addon, i believe that it is essential to look as professional as it works since that raises the trust factor for users.