[RESOLVED] Development builds via SSL?

Bug reports and enhancement requests
tlu
Senior Member
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:01 pm

[RESOLVED] Development builds via SSL?

Post by tlu »

AdblockPlus is now secured with SSL - a good move, IMHO. Giorgio, is there a chance that NS development builds will also be available via SSL in the foreseeable future?
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090627 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Minefield/3.6a1pre AutoPager/0.5.2.2 (http://www.teesoft.info/)
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9524
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: Development builds via SSL?

Post by Giorgio Maone »

tlu wrote:Is there a chance that NS development builds will also be available via SSL in the foreseeable future?
Yes, it will be done immediately after next stable release.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
tlu
Senior Member
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:01 pm

Re: Development builds via SSL?

Post by tlu »

Giorgio Maone wrote:
tlu wrote:Is there a chance that NS development builds will also be available via SSL in the foreseeable future?
Yes, it will be done immediately after next stable release.
Great - thanks a lot!
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090627 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Minefield/3.6a1pre AutoPager/0.5.2.2 (http://www.teesoft.info/)
dhouwn
Bug Buster
Posts: 968
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:51 pm

Re: Development builds via SSL?

Post by dhouwn »

Comparing to Adblock Plus seems to be the way to go if you want something from Giorgio… :twisted:




AdblockPlus has now a bug tracker - a good move, IMHO. Giorgio, is there a chance that NS will have one in the foreseeable future?





SCNR
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090620 Firefox/3.5
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9524
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: Development builds via SSL?

Post by Giorgio Maone »

dhouwn wrote:Giorgio, is there a chance that NS will have one in the foreseeable future?
Nope.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: Development builds via SSL?

Post by Tom T. »

dhouwn wrote:Comparing to Adblock Plus seems to be the way to go if you want something from Giorgio… :twisted:
That was inappropriate and completely uncalled for. Please stay on topic in future posts. Thank you.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US at an expert level; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 diehard
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3370
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: Development builds via SSL?

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

In my opinion it shows total lack of respect and appreciation for what Giorgio does and frankly to compare ANYTHING to ABP is ignorant, apples and oranges. If you like how ABP does things, you might want to ask him to provide you this invaluable service, oh wait, he can't. :roll:
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: Development builds via SSL?

Post by therube »

Maybe you are reading something more into it then should be?

I just took it to mean something like a : wink :.

Or I could be wrong.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090617 SeaMonkey/2.0b1pre
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: Development builds via SSL?

Post by Tom T. »

therube wrote:I just took it to mean something like a : wink :.
Then why would he have chosen Twisted Evil instead of a : wink : ?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US at an expert level; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 diehard
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3370
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: Development builds via SSL?

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

I have to agree with Tom on this and you saw my response already, it comes across with a malicious connotation to it and its not appreciated, no matter how its justified, especially that more is expected from a friend of this forum like dhouwn. A wink is a wink and its available but that's not what it was, unless you are not seeing enough into it.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9524
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: Development builds via SSL?

Post by Giorgio Maone »

Both NoScript and FlashGot builds are served through SSL now.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3370
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: Development builds via SSL?

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

Giorgio Maone wrote:Both NoScript and FlashGot builds are served through SSL now.
Thank you. Although I personally think its unnecessary, I am sure it will be appreciated. ;)
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: [RESOLVED] Development builds via SSL?

Post by therube »

Drats!

I would typically load http://noscript.net/getit#devel, then download the latest #dev with LeechFTP.
LeechFTP being my every day, general purpose "downloader" <URL Snatcher (grabs URLs from Clipboard)>.
But LeechFTP does not do https: :cry:.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090617 SeaMonkey/2.0b1pre
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: [RESOLVED] Development builds via SSL?

Post by Tom T. »

I've always liked that AMO served downloads over SSL (although they're a little behind the state-of-art with RC4-128). It's just one_less_opportunity for evil to happen. Thanks, Giorgio.

(although I didn't get an SSL connection: the cert was not valid before 20:54 UTC and I went there at 20:37 :D )
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US at an expert level; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 diehard
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: [RESOLVED] Development builds via SSL?

Post by Tom T. »

therube wrote:I would typically load http://noscript.net/getit#devel, then download the latest #dev with LeechFTP.
LeechFTP being my every day, general purpose "downloader" <URL Snatcher (grabs URLs from Clipboard)>.
But LeechFTP does not do https: :cry:.
Pardon my ignorance, but I don't see how that's faster than clicking a bookmark or the forum link to dev build, then clicking "download latest dev build", which *does* do https? 2 clicks - done.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US at an expert level; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 diehard
Post Reply