Is blocking cookies a treat?
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 8:21 am
I started to do some little programming usign PHP. (I don't like it, I prefer Python, but it's the most used, so...)
Using sessions I understood that if session id is not stored in cookies, it must be propagated with POST (or GET...). I noticed that some sites uses automatically GET if they can't set cookies. I think that it's much more secure to allow non-third party cookies by default instead of having this. For example, if I remember well, phpBB by default sends the session id using GET, but this board removed that "feature".
You can see if the site is using GET checking the URL (even if I don't check the URL every time I login to a site...), but it's hard to understand if the site is using POST (I think you can see it refreshing a site page while you're logged in, but memory plays a role here as for checking URL for GET).
What do you think about?
Using sessions I understood that if session id is not stored in cookies, it must be propagated with POST (or GET...). I noticed that some sites uses automatically GET if they can't set cookies. I think that it's much more secure to allow non-third party cookies by default instead of having this. For example, if I remember well, phpBB by default sends the session id using GET, but this board removed that "feature".
You can see if the site is using GET checking the URL (even if I don't check the URL every time I login to a site...), but it's hard to understand if the site is using POST (I think you can see it refreshing a site page while you're logged in, but memory plays a role here as for checking URL for GET).
What do you think about?