Page 1 of 1

??? Why RP`s memu lists more than NS`s

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:52 am
by 江3如此多娇
I just use RP to get more detail of the sites list

cause I found it usually lists sites more than the NS` memu.

Why :?: I guess, the difference come from whether the Sites called by the main page cantains JS, if not, then hided in the NS menu list.

Am I right :?: help :D

Re: ??? Why RP`s memu lists more than NS`s

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:14 pm
by therube
I would guess that you're on the right path, but NoScript does not hide sites, they simply do not exist at the particular time.

If Y depends on X, but you have not allowed X, then Y does not exist - at that point.
Once you allow X, then Y becomes visible.

Re: ??? Why RP`s memu lists more than NS`s

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:16 am
by 江3如此多娇
therube wrote:If Y depends on X, but you have not allowed X, then Y does not exist - at that point.
Once you allow X, then Y becomes visible.
U mean just as mentioned in this post: Why must I "Temporarily allow all this page" REPEATEDLY?

Thank you for answer, I still have more Qs to ask later :lol: forgive me :D

Re: ??? Why RP`s memu lists more than NS`s

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 9:35 am
by Thrawn
NoScript only cares about active content - scripts, flash, java, etc. It will not block images or stylesheets, but RequestPolicy will. So sites that only serve those things will only show up in RP.