Am I understanding these ABE rules correctly?
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:17 am
After reading some documentation on how ABE works, my understanding is that I can use ABE to block cross-site requests. That is, I can prevent any connections whatsoever to third-party domains of my choosing (e.g., facebook.com). Using ABE like this to prevent this connection would not just block scripts emanting from the third-party site, it would block everything emanting from the third-party site (e.g., images, stylesheets, fonts, etc).
As an example, I could configure ABE to block facebook.com and then if I navigate to another website (e.g., www.cnet.com) that normally makes a request for data from facebook.com, this request will be blocked by ABE and facebook.com will never receive that request and will never know to send any data to my computer. Do I understand this correctly?
Is this rule doing what I describe above?
Site facebook.com *.facebook.com = identifies the website "facebook.com" and all websites that have "facebook.com" as the top-level domain (e.g., some.facebook.com, some.some.facebook.com).
Deny INCLUSION = says to deny all connections to facebook.com and *.facebook.com unless facebook.com is the top-level domain (e.g., which would be the case if I have purposely typed facebook.com into Firefox's URL address bar). Am I understanding this accurately?
As an example, I could configure ABE to block facebook.com and then if I navigate to another website (e.g., www.cnet.com) that normally makes a request for data from facebook.com, this request will be blocked by ABE and facebook.com will never receive that request and will never know to send any data to my computer. Do I understand this correctly?
Is this rule doing what I describe above?
Code: Select all
Site facebook.com *.facebook.com
Deny INCLUSION
Deny INCLUSION = says to deny all connections to facebook.com and *.facebook.com unless facebook.com is the top-level domain (e.g., which would be the case if I have purposely typed facebook.com into Firefox's URL address bar). Am I understanding this accurately?