Page 1 of 1

Re: SUB and INCLUSION(SUBDOC)

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:48 am
by Thrawn

Re: SUB and INCLUSION(SUBDOC)

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:27 am
by Thrawn
I'm afraid I can't tell you any more than is in that document. I haven't delved into the finer details of ABE configuration; my focus is more on building a friendlier interface for it.

You can wait and see whether Giorgio replies, or you can experiment :).

Re: SUB and INCLUSION(SUBDOC)

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:37 pm
by Giorgio Maone
They are disjointed for historical reasons (INCLUSION came later than SUB), and have a different implementation, but they're semantically equivalent.

Re: SUB and INCLUSION(SUBDOC)

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:09 am
by Thrawn
So SUB would now be deprecated?

Re: SUB and INCLUSION(SUBDOC)

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:15 pm
by Giorgio Maone
Thrawn wrote:So SUB would now be deprecated?
Not in the foreseeable future.