BUGS: 1.9.4.x Dev

Bug reports and enhancement requests
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

1.9.4.9 HTTPS Images/Connection Errors

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

I installed the 1.9.4.9 dev build and I have noticed that on several HTTPS sites, the images fail to load and show broken. Now if you load them in the URL bar directly, they load fine but not on the page and no matter how many times you refresh and they are whitelisted sites. Logging out and closing the tab and trying again "usually" loads the image, this is very reminiscent of the HTTPS image from cache issue that was apparently resolved a while back. It seems to be back again.

Also, I have encountered two sites today, one of them is a web proxy (proxify) in which it shows JS is disabled and there if no functionality, despite the site being whitelisted, there is no sub-url or reference shown or needed either. In one case, closing Fx after permanent whitelist and restarting fixed the issue but NOT the other and definitely not when its temporarily whitelisted, what's the issue here?

Here are screenshots showing lack of JS while showing NS is whitelisted.
ImageImage
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: BUGS: 1.9.4.x Dev

Post by therube »

Looks to be another one.
Same sort of symptoms. Clicked an "external" link (from an "HTML aware" text editor). URL is shown on Location Bar, but status shows "Stopped", & page never loads.
At the end of the day today, I noticed that I had a hung SeaMonkey processess, so that may have contributed to what I saw. But then I don't know when it manifested itself? Could have been there a for a long time (days)? Didn't think at the time to see if it was a SeaMonkey 1 or SeaMonkey 2 seamonkey.exe. If it were a 2, then it wouldn't have mattered cause I was running 1.

-------

This was NoScript 1.9.4.6, SeaMonkey 2, Intel, from the 23rd.
Wasn't doing a whole lot. Memory was manageable, 218MB, spikes still there about 8% but seemed inconsequential.

http://i40.tinypic.com/df927p.jpg

Then as I was closing down windows, memory dropped to 167MB, spikes still there but to a lessor degree, around 5%.

http://i39.tinypic.com/33a5ow6.jpg

No surprises (& without really pushing SeaMonkey 2 yet) I have to say my earlier issues (not releasing memory) seem resolved at the 1.9.4.6 level.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090617 SeaMonkey/2.0b1pre
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: BUGS: 1.9.4.x Dev

Post by therube »

I get a broken https: at https://proxify.com/.

Are you logged in at proxify?

I see nothing alerting me as to the status of JavaScript?
I do not see the string, "This site needs JavaScript"?

The site (without logging in) appears to work for me without enabling JavaScript.

Maybe I have the wrong "proxify"? URL?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090617 SeaMonkey/2.0b1pre
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: 1.9.4.9 HTTPS Images/Connection Errors

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

therube wrote:I get a broken https: at https://proxify.com/.

Are you logged in at proxify?

I see nothing alerting me as to the status of JavaScript?

The site (without logging in) appears to work for me without enabling JavaScript.

Maybe I have the wrong "proxify"? URL?
1. Go to: http://proxyfy.com/
2. Enter a url to whatever, the user was trying: http://newpersepolis.myminicity.com/
3. You will get the first screen shot I posted on the next page (which happens to be: https://proxify.com/p/011110A0000110/ht ... ity.com=2f) and that's even with the site allowed

Additional bizarreness with the NS icons and stuff too. You can see in this screenshot, that the site is whitelisted but the icon is wrong and the tooltip is also wrong. Something is definitely wrong.
Image
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: BUGS: 1.9.4.x Dev

Post by therube »

I got an XSS:

Code: Select all

[NoScript XSS] Sanitized suspicious upload to [https://proxify.com/p/011110A0000110/proxify/proxy] from [http://proxyfy.com/]: transformed into a download-only GET request.
& when I Unsafe Reload ...

Then I do get the JavaScript message you displayed whilst proxify.com is whitelisted.

Code: Select all

user_pref("noscript.temp", "proxify.com http://proxify.com https://proxify.com");
Now if I start with the https: URL initially (& other then the broken https: warning) & get none of that & it appears to work fine.

Someone has a typo ...
from [http://proxyfy.com/]:
OH, you have a typo? Do you? Or is that something intentional?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090617 SeaMonkey/2.0b1pre
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: BUGS: 1.9.4.x Dev

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

No typo, its correct. Proxyfy.com and it routes to Proxify.com, there is also proxify.net, .org, .biz and etc etc.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: BUGS: 1.9.4.x Dev

Post by therube »

And what happens if you whitelist Proxyfy.com?

With proxyfy.com AND proxify.com both whitelisted, it works.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090617 SeaMonkey/2.0b1pre
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: 1.9.4.9 HTTPS Images/Connection Errors

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

For the purpose of trying to figure this out, Proxyfy.com, Proxify.com, Proxify.net has all been whitelisted, makes no difference. The endpoint, the site I listed earlier was even whitelisted, just in case it has something to do with it.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: BUGS: 1.9.4.x Dev

Post by therube »

(First Revoking my Temporary Allows ...)

When starting with the http://proxyfy.com URL, whitelisting that looks to be all that is needed.
Once I do that it works, rolls over to https://proxify.com/ without complaint (other then the broken https icon), & loads my selected site.

So from what I see, that is all I need on my end.

(Some screwy domains that they have.)

Or you can start with https://proxify.com/ & forgo whitelisting altogether.

OH, & if you use a site like http://www.whatismyip.com/ to "proxify", you will see that whatismyip.com returns a proxied IP, not your actual IP.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090617 SeaMonkey/2.0b1pre
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: 1.9.4.9 HTTPS Images/Connection Errors

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

Well that's an interesting finding because that is NOT what's happening here, but then again you are on SeaMonkey right? Might be something malfunctioning with NS that is affecting Fx installations. Just thinking out loud on that one, not sure, just the only difference between yours and my installations that I can think of at the moment.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: BUGS: 1.9.4.x Dev

Post by therube »

Thinking it's something on your end.
Just tried it on FF 3.0.10 & it worked as I described.

Create a new Profile, install NoScript & see what happens.

OH, & you do have chrome: specifically whitelisted (it seems). See if that matters. (IOW, try a Reset.)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090617 SeaMonkey/2.0b1pre
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: BUGS: 1.9.4.x Dev

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

The chrome only showed up because I used screengrab to capture the screenshot and that requires chrome, not there otherwise.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: 1.9.4.9 Sub-document Whitelist Fails

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

Ok, in addition to the HTTPS broken image issue and the connection failures until reboot after whitelisting, now there is an issue that if you temporarily whitelist an iframe, nothing shows. The only way to make it work is to permanent whitelist and restart Fx, which is totally defeating the principle of temp allow/disallow on the fly. Hopefully while we are sleeping on this side of the world, Giorgio can let me know what he thinks is going on or possibly even have a fix for me to try tomorrow.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: BUGS: 1.9.4.x Dev

Post by therube »

URL?

URL = http://djeault.blogspot.com/2007/02/iframe-test.html

URL = http://www.nicky.net/4images/iframe.html

Both working as expected here.

With the second site, you need to Allow the IFRAME 3 times (but that is expected).

Did you ever try that new Profile?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 SeaMonkey/1.1.17
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9524
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: BUGS: 1.9.4.x Dev

Post by Giorgio Maone »

@GµårÐïåñ:
I'm still trying to reproduce.
I've got no doubt you're on some issue, but I'm not sure it's from NoScript (alone, at least).
Can you try on a clean profile (as therube suggested), and if it works try Standard Diagnostic?
If you're using Request Policy, my best bets are on that one. 2nd line, ABP.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Post Reply