
Your forgiven well by me and family at least
"Let him who is without sin cast the first stone..."
You update so frequently, the page opens so much, it's a bloody pop up at this point. You're the fire alarm that goes off when the wind blows - eventually it gets ignored and every now and then people peer around to make sure they're ok. So no matter HOW automatic it was, your self righteousness in assuming everyone will go there and read the one change to a page that people won't always read.Giorgio Maone wrote: The apology comes together with the release notes page, opened automatically when you install or update NoScript.
A. Frequency of updates is too high. I have a life. I'm not going to pore over every change log entry every day just 'cause you updated.If they read the apology, they should have read also the announcement of the filterset (it was in the same box).
And yes, I read the changelog of any product I upgrade, even for those for which I need to go manually to the relevant page.
Because we trusted you were doing the right thing and just keeping us ahead of the pack. We assumed you were fighting against some jerks who were skirting noscript. I'm a programmer too. I know it's not easy. So why should you assume everyone thinks like you?BTW, since some there also suggested that NoScript was too simple to require so many update, why didn't just check the changelog (or the code, for who's capable to)?
Redemption is not for everyone. You don't get to judge how you are redeemed.Giorgio Maone wrote: However, putting my apologies well in evidence on the release notes page seemed and still seems to me the most honest ...
A tad harsh I feel. He has admitted to his mistake, quickly apologised in the way he thought would get the apology to the Noscript/ABP userbase in the quickest way and has stated he is working on a more substantial apology. Look at this thread, when I checked it last night it was at ~5 pages, it's now more than triple that. Giorgio himself has replied in it many times between rushing out new versions of Noscript to remove the behaviour/features that caused this furor in the first place.Guest wrote:Redemption is not for everyone. You don't get to judge how you are redeemed.
This too is an excellent point. A little more complacency and a bit continued "everything is fine" will not only help every out but will do you less good. Ever wondered how things got to be the way they are, that everyone falls in line and lets horrible things around them occur because they insist just that? If not for anyone else, do yourself a favour and get back to what's important in life. Living.aZmoDen wrote:That is an excellent point. A little less rabbid hatred and a bit of a break will not only help someone out but will do yourself alot of good too. Ever wondered why the angry and abusive people get hit health problems? if not for anyone else, do yourself a favour and get back to whats important in life.
Who would trust a person about computersecurity-issues any longer, if that person has repeatedly and forcefully and secretly misused our trust with full intention? Once a liar, always a liar... And even the apologies sound like: "Oh. I drove You car (without permisssion) and broke it (by intent!!!). Sorry (that I got caught)! As A SIGN OF MY GOOD WILL: I quickfix it for You. :O)"aZmoDen wrote:Ever wondered why the angry and abusive people get hit health problems?
He could just remove his redirect at this point and everything would have been ok then but he wanted the ads to be displayed at any cost.Guest wrote:That is Giorgio's right. Ares stepped over the line when he blocked everything because Giorgio was keeping one step ahead of him. Then Giorgio did a big no-no with his dicking around with the ABP code. However, Ares really should have his face in the dirt, like Giorgio, because he is the person who chose to escalate this time and time again.Guest wrote:These filters were needed to block the ads on your site and because you kept changing them (and you still are changing them). Breaking a site of you was never intended but Ares needed to change the filters in this way only to block the ads.Giorgio Maone wrote:But please believe that it was made out of anger and hurry, rather than greed, since at that time literally everything was blocked by EasyList on my sites.
Interesting point of view. Mine is that Wladimir and Ares2 wanted to remove all ads from Giorgio's web site, at any cost, including breaking his web site until he capitulated. When his site was broken by the ridiculously broad filters used by Adblock Plus, Giorgio should have given up and asked his users and AMO for help. His mistake was trying to solve this on his own. A big mistake we're all paying for, especially him. A lot of good will come out of this, I hope, but it sure is a painful process.Guest wrote:He could just remove his redirect at this point and everything would have been ok then but he wanted the ads to be displayed at any cost.
Again: that was a false positive and it was never intended.Alan Baxter wrote:...including breaking his web site until he capitulated.
The Hackademix post I'm trying to finish is titled "Dear Adblock Plus Users, Dear Mozilla Community" in facts.dan wrote: I believe that you apology should be to all users of NoScript, not just to ABP users.