Page 2 of 2

Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:08 pm
by Giorgio Maone
Tom T. wrote: *The existing tab remains broken, while the new tab works.*
Reloading the broken tab doesn't fix it.
Bug in the unsandboxing code: while JavaScript gets enabled back when document changes, plugins, subdocuments and meta-refreshes are not.
Fixed in latest development build 2.3.5rc5, thank you.

Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:56 pm
by TheCrap
Thanks alot.

The thread can be closed and maybe moved to ABE related.

Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:58 pm
by TheCrap
Why don't i also get credit in the changelog for finding this bug? :mrgreen:
TheCrap wrote: The rule seems to be right because there is no restriction for maps and gstatic but ends in an incomrehensible behavior on google maps.

[...]

Definitely it has something to do with how the rule is handle.

Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:27 pm
by Giorgio Maone
TheCrap wrote:Why don't i also get credit in the changelog for finding this bug? :mrgreen:
I'll be happy to credit you when you provide a less stinky nickname of your choice.

Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:10 pm
by TheCrap
I' using this nick since i have inet in 1990s :(

Then i choose my real name "Patrick E."

Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:29 pm
by Giorgio Maone
TheCrap wrote:Then i choose my real name "Patrick E."
Fixed, thanks.

Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 3:24 am
by Tom T.
Giorgio Maone wrote:
TheCrap wrote:Why don't i also get credit in the changelog for finding this bug? :mrgreen:
I'll be happy to credit you when you provide a less stinky nickname of your choice.
http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopi ... 487#p36487
Tom T. wrote:Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:55 am (UTC) @ TheCrap: ...And since you're not registered, would you consider using a name that wouldn't possibly be found offensive by any segment of our user base? ;)
I had already tried, Boss. ;)

@ Patrick E:

Every site is free to set its own standards. We want to keep this site as user-friendly to all as possible, which means: no offensive language.

See Forum Rules #4. It's the one in ALL CAPS at the top of each forum,
'PLEASE READ THIS FIRST! -- FORUM RULES AND GUIDELINES".

Still, since it was not a registered name, I take responsibility for not editing it earlier.

Thanks for finding and reporting the issue.