Page 2 of 2
					
				Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root
				Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:08 pm
				by Giorgio Maone
				Tom T. wrote:
*The existing tab remains broken, while the new tab works.* 
Reloading the broken tab doesn't fix it.
Bug in the unsandboxing code: while JavaScript gets enabled back when document changes, plugins, subdocuments and meta-refreshes are not.
Fixed in 
latest development build 2.3.5rc5, thank you.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root
				Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:56 pm
				by TheCrap
				Thanks alot.
The thread can be closed and maybe moved to ABE related.
			 
			
					
				Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root
				Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:58 pm
				by TheCrap
				Why don't i also get credit in the changelog for finding this bug?  
 
TheCrap wrote:
The rule seems to be right because there is no restriction for maps and gstatic but ends in an incomrehensible behavior on google maps.
[...]
Definitely it has something to do with how the rule is handle.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root
				Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:27 pm
				by Giorgio Maone
				TheCrap wrote:Why don't i also get credit in the changelog for finding this bug?  
  
I'll be happy to credit you when you provide a less stinky nickname of your choice.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root
				Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:10 pm
				by TheCrap
				I' using this nick since i have inet in 1990s  
 
Then i choose my real name "Patrick E."
 
			 
			
					
				Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root
				Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:29 pm
				by Giorgio Maone
				TheCrap wrote:Then i choose my real name "Patrick E."
Fixed, thanks.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: Allowance for subfolder but not for root
				Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 3:24 am
				by Tom T.
				Giorgio Maone wrote:TheCrap wrote:Why don't i also get credit in the changelog for finding this bug?  
  
I'll be happy to credit you when you provide a less stinky nickname of your choice.
 
http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopi ... 487#p36487Tom T. wrote:Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:55 am (UTC) 
@ TheCrap: ...And since you're not registered, would you consider using a name that wouldn't possibly be found offensive by any segment of our user base?  

 
I had already tried, Boss.  
@ Patrick E:
Every site is free to set its own standards. We want to keep this site as user-friendly to all as possible, which means: no offensive language. 
See 
Forum Rules #4. It's the one in ALL CAPS at the top of each forum, 
'PLEASE READ THIS FIRST! -- FORUM RULES AND GUIDELINES". 
Still, since it was not a registered name, I take responsibility for not editing it earlier. 
Thanks for finding and reporting the issue.