InformAction Forums

So there, therube you are with me. I get the same reactions as you.Hence now it is upto Giorgio on where he places this as a priority. Might be tempted to overlook as this is not critical..

By the way what is the software you use to capture and edit the screens? It is amazing to have the thumbnail (literal) also in the picture.

(FastStone Capture 5.3 (older Freeware version). Has option to include mouse in screenshot.)

therube wrote:(FastStone Capture 5.3 (older Freeware version). Has option to include mouse in screenshot.)

Thanks a ton mate.Wonder where such an excellent software was hiding. If you could bring out the names of other software you found great in webtech or other forum...

Knock Knock....Hello? Anything on this....Is this a bug afterall or not?

It will be fixed this way in next build.

Running 1.9.8.7 ,still not worked out I believe ...

By the way why does "Recently blocked sites" list my whitelisted sites.Does not make any sense to me...

nagan wrote:Running 1.9.8.7 ,still not worked out I believe ...

By the way why does "Recently blocked sites" list my whitelisted sites.Does not make any sense to me...

Why are you reporting two issues which have been both fixed in latest development build some days ago?

I do not know...Whilst I searched for Addons via FF it returned negative for NS .Only then I reported. By the way do you propose to distinguish the devolopment build from the release version.They seem to carry on the serial numbers .

#dev builds will only appear on Giorgio's pages. They will not appear on AMO where only his releases will show.

The numbering will be different between the #dev & the release, though there may not be a way to differentiate which is which by looking at a bunch of downloads. (I always <manually> add a "-dev" when I download a #dev version. So my download would show, noscript-1.9.8.71-dev.xpi, where the current release will not, noscript-1.9.8.8.xpi.)