Re: NoScript Didn't Block Rogue Site
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 9:15 am
Yes I'm sure. Think about TOR user, with very limited bandwidth.
NoScripters and WebSec nerds of all lands, unite!
https://forums.informaction.com/
Thank you... finally someone who understands that FF will start downloading a file while you make up your mind whether you want to download it or not. The thing is, I never got the dialog to make that choice. NOD32's Internet Monitor must have stopped the download when enough packets came in.nagan wrote:Well it has got to do with how FF works! When FF senses something to be download it initiates it at full speed and PARALLELY throws the user confirmation to download. In effect it means FF does not wait for confirmation to BEGIN download
My bad... I said "install" in my initial post, because I thought some rogue script or exploit was attempting to do just that. Because I saw no dialog, I was surprised to see the NOD32 alert which made me suspect the worst hence the verbiage. Perhaps I should have said "download" instead of "install" to avoid this confusion.Tom T. wrote:I think a major part of the confusion is understanding that "downloading" and "installing" sw are two different things
To protect yourself specifically against this kind of threat, you may want to look into the Search Engine Security (SES) extension for Firefox from Zscaler: http://research.zscaler.com/2010/10/upd ... lugin.htmljB wrote:I was recently searching something on Google and clicked on a link that took me to a site that redirected me to a malicious rogue site