10.1.3rc2 - was it pulled?

Ask for help about NoScript, no registration needed to post
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7977
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

10.1.3rc2 - was it pulled?

Post by therube »

https://noscript.net/getit#devel
10.1.3rc2 - was it pulled?

if not, its not there?


various other posts mention things like, "10.1.3c3"

is there such an item?
why "c3" rather then "rc3"?


feeds, https://noscript.net/feed?t=a, only shows through 10.1.3rc1?


& while we're here, why does center-clicking a link, say, https://secure.informaction.com/downloa ... 1.3rc1.xpi
report, "Firefox prevented this site from asking you to install software on your computer" - with the only "option" being, "OK"?

yet a left-click works as expected, after Allowing, then Installing?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.2
barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 11138
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: 10.1.3rc2 - was it pulled?

Post by barbaz »

The 10.1.3c3 release appears to be some sort of stable release that hasn't yet been published on Giorgio's sites. It's currently only available on AMO.

10.1.3rc2 and 10.1.3c2 seem to have been pulled both from AMO and Giorgio's site.

10.1.3rc1 (from /feed?t=a) and 10.1.3c1 (from AMO stable channel version history) are completely identical.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
8-bit
Senior Member
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:43 pm

Re: 10.1.3rc2 - was it pulled?

Post by 8-bit »

Yeah, you can't get/install 10.1.3rc2 because it causes a MAJOR issue (clearing all check boxes for Trused sites in prefs) when updating to 10.1.3(r)c3. rc1 Doesn't have this problem:
https://hackademix.net/2017/11/28/growi ... ment-39242 - see above posts as well...
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:57.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/57.0
Post Reply