
What does firefox.com have to do with noscript.net? I didn't opt in for any tracking of my actions in noscript's settings.
Should I firewall noscript.net?
And the most ridiculous thing I've heard is Maone praising WebExtensions on mozilla blog.GµårÐïåñ wrote:No it is not spying on you, the most ridiculous thing I have heard.
No, I have not. Since when do extensions have documentation other than the text on their AMO page or in addon settings in AOM?GµårÐïåñ wrote:Have you ever read the documentation?
There is what exactly? Do WebExtensions force to spy on users?GµårÐïåñ wrote:WebExtensions which were forced upon everyone by Mozilla behave slightly differently, so there is that.
What ping? I don't want extensions I use to ping their servers.GµårÐïåñ wrote:Another the ping against the db to check reputation, which I am not sure if he ported over or not yet.
GµårÐïåñ wrote:Another likely is that ABE is checking WAN IP to ensure you are protected against LOCAL attacks.
Not my case.GµårÐïåñ wrote:Less likely but still common among those who don't know what they are doing, is that you are using HOST files that are causing it, read this.
That's my case, thanks. So it's yet another stupid feature that users don't know about.barbaz wrote:That's the "Site Info" feature. You must have middle-clicked or shift-clicked the menu item by mistake.
iDrugoy, show this attitude here again and we will show you the door.iDrugoy wrote:And the most ridiculous thing I've heard is Maone praising WebExtensions on mozilla blog.GµårÐïåñ wrote:No it is not spying on you, the most ridiculous thing I have heard.
No, I have not. Since when do extensions have documentation other than the text on their AMO page or in addon settings in AOM?GµårÐïåñ wrote:Have you ever read the documentation?
There is what exactly? Do WebExtensions force to spy on users?GµårÐïåñ wrote:WebExtensions which were forced upon everyone by Mozilla behave slightly differently, so there is that.
[...]
it's yet another stupid feature that users don't know about.