NoScript 2.9.5.3

[barbaz]

If the developer wants to produce a version specific for Pale Moon, the following can be used with regards to where such a version can be hosted (so we can get updates properly):

(emphasis mine)

NoScript's Pale Moon support is completely unofficial - viewtopic.php?p=82064#p82064

I think this is not likely to happen.

[Jojo999]

A lot of people are tired with the directions that Mozilla has been taking Firefox and so some have migrated to PM.

Would it really be that hard to make NS compatible with PM add-on requirements?

Or maybe we have to look at other solutions such as Umatrix?

[barbaz]

Would it really be that hard to make NS compatible with PM add-on requirements?

Currently, making NoScript compatible with Pale Moon is not the hard part. NoScript already works in Pale Moon. And hopefully that will continue until NoScript becomes a WebExtension.

The hard part is Giorgio finding the time and inclination to make Pale Moon support more official. And given this comment, I don't see it happening.

Or maybe we have to look at other solutions such as Umatrix?

If updates are that important, I would say probably yes. But µMatrix is not a NoScript replacement.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=22001#p83579
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=22518#p86526

One way around this might be to use one of those feed reader addons and point it to the NoScript feed. Then when it shows something unread, that's your notification of a NoScript update.
Stable versions - https://noscript.net/feed
Recent dev versions - https://noscript.net/feed?t=b
All versions - https://noscript.net/feed?t=a