This isn't specifically a NS problem, and I haven't verified it yet. But at the moment, my copies of FF 3.6.28 are unable to verify any signed add-ins.
I only mention it because I wonder if, what with the changes to signing, the process used by FF 3.6.28 may not be supported anymore?
In which case, you may wish to add to the download page another line about legacy versions.
FF 3.6.28 rejecting signed add-ins
-
anon345345
FF 3.6.28 rejecting signed add-ins
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Firefox/3.6.28
Re: FF 3.6.28 rejecting signed add-ins
Thanks for reporting this. Technically 3.6.28 is supported by Giorgio, but as it hasn't been supported by Mozilla in a long time, I can't recommend using it - especially if you're concerned enough about security to use NoScript.
What kind of failure are you seeing? Any specific error message(s)?
What kind of failure are you seeing? Any specific error message(s)?
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/41.0
Re: FF 3.6.28 rejecting signed add-ins
This is likely not the issue:because signing could not be verified.-260
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... 8&t=597317
But something along these lines most likely is:
http://microdevsys.com/wp/firefox-firef ... -verified/
I suppose basically you're attempting to use an outdated program that uses now outdated methods (ciphers) when dealing with current extensions.
Remove the META-INF directory from the xpi & it will install successfully.
(Operation could be a different matter.)
Other then "piece of mind" - of the extension itself, signing serves no purpose in something that old. And given you're using something that old anyhow, its kind of contradictory.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/41.0 SeaMonkey/2.38
-
Rickajho
Re: FF 3.6.28 rejecting signed add-ins
Can someone out there make this easier for us? Can you tell us which certificate this install uses? Wouldn't the suggestion at microdevsys.com then work if we changed the appropriate certificate setting in FF to "This certificate can identify software makers" as suggested? (Obviously I have encountered the same problem...)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Firefox/3.6.28
Re: FF 3.6.28 rejecting signed add-ins
If you really can't update Firefox (which would certainly be my recommendation) or switch to another browser, then you may as well just remove the META-INF directory from the extension.
Obviously you have a very restricted environment, and extension signing is not likely to give you much value.
Obviously you have a very restricted environment, and extension signing is not likely to give you much value.
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0