NoScript Suite "Lite"

General discussion about the NoScript extension for Firefox
Post Reply
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7426
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

NoScript Suite "Lite"

Post by therube » Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:11 pm

NoScript Suite Lite

Brought to you by an "AdblockLite".

And he also makes some "Adblock Lite" & a Flash Block "Plus" (among others).

AMO really needs to change their policies.
A fork, & using a very similar name is one thing, but for an extension to simply ride on the name of another extension...


http:// mybrowseraddon.com/
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.35

barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 9180
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: NoScript Suite "Lite"

Post by barbaz » Mon Sep 21, 2015 3:59 pm

Moving to NoScript General...

Isn't that a trademark violation?
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-

barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 9180
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: NoScript Suite "Lite"

Post by barbaz » Mon Sep 21, 2015 4:15 pm

Decided to disassemble it, to see how deep this rabbit hole goes.

It's written in the Addon SDK... AFAICT looks like it's using entirely its own codebase, which is good.

But look at this:

Code: Select all

var defaultAllowedUrls =
  [
    "https://us-mg4.mail.yahoo.com",
    "https://translate.google.com",
    "http://www.wunderground.com",
    "https://accounts.google.com",
    "https://addons.mozilla.org",
    "https://chrome.google.com",
    "http://mybrowseraddon.com",
    "http://www.microsoft.com",
    "https://www.facebook.com",
    "https://addons.opera.com",
    "https://plus.google.com",
    "https://office.live.com",
    "https://www.mozilla.org",
    "https://www.youtube.com",
    "https://mail.google.com",
    "https://www.tumblr.com/",
    "https://login.yahoo.com",
    "https://www.paypal.com",
    "http://store.apple.com",
    "https://www.icloud.com",
    "https://www.google.com",
    "https://www.yahoo.com",
    "http://www.amazon.com",
    "https://twitter.com",
    "https://hotmail.com",
    "https://github.com",
    "https://feedly.com",
    "http://digg.com",
    "https://live.com",
    "http://www.msn.com",
    "http://www.last.fm",
    "http://www.ebay.com",
    "http://www.bing.com",
    "http://www.imdb.com",
    "http://www.apple.com",
    "http://www.fedex.com",
    "https://instagram.com",
    "http://www.reddit.com",
    "https://www.chase.com",
    "https://login.live.com",
    "http://sourceforge.net",
    "https://soundcloud.com",
    "https://www.blogger.com",
    "https://signin.ebay.com",
    "https://www.dropbox.com",
    "http://stackoverflow.com",
    "https://www.linkedin.com",
    "https://www.pinterest.com",
    "https://www.craigslist.org",
    "https://www.bankofamerica.com"
  ];

I would not trust a significant fraction of those...
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-

User avatar
Thrawn
Senior Member
Posts: 3106
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:46 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: NoScript Suite "Lite"

Post by Thrawn » Tue Sep 22, 2015 3:13 am

barbaz wrote:Isn't that a trademark violation?

Probably, if Giorgio chooses to pursue it...typically he doesn't, though.

The fact that they're asking for a $10 donation is a bit steep...

AFAICT looks like it's using entirely its own codebase, which is good.

Maybe it would be worth Giorgio's time to check it out and make use of bits of it.

I would not trust a significant fraction of those...

Yeah, me neither.
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.

True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/40.0

User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7426
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: NoScript Suite "Lite"

Post by therube » Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:34 pm

BUMP.


Addons Manager sucks (more so now, like with no readily determinable version numbers).

The Addons Manager "Get Add-ons" feature (something I've never used or even looked at before) sucks.
You do a search & it returns results, but again no readily determinable version numbers.

Do a search for "noscript".

Results display, by default I suppose, "Best match".
#1 "best match" is "NoScript Suite Lite".
I saw that, & it threw me, until I remembered this thread.
After that #1 hit, 14 other items display - none of which are "NoScript".

It is not until & unless you click (the barely visible) "See all 33 results", that you are taken to https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/search/?q=noscript&platform=WINNT&appver=43.0.4 at which point "NoScript Security Suite" is (correctly) listed as the first hit.


What, do you need to pay Mozilla (AdWords) to get your keyword properly listed in Addons Manager "Get Add-ons"?


That stinks, & I'd be pissed - at both Mozilla, & this jackleg "Lite".


(BTW, SeaMonkey does correctly return "NoScript Security Suite" as its #1 hit.)
[In FF, not "noscript", not "noscript security", not "noscript suite", not "noscript security suite", takes you to "NoScript Security Suite".]
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.39

User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7426
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: NoScript Suite "Lite"

Post by therube » Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:46 pm

Wow! Mozilla forces extension signing, yet their Get Add-ons (& even AMO itself) are going to do nothing but to contribute the the very "side-loads" that they should be looking to restrict.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.39

barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 9180
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: NoScript Suite "Lite"

Post by barbaz » Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:54 pm

therube wrote:Do a search for "noscript".

With NoScript installed or not? This makes a difference last I checked - addons you have already installed won't show up in Get Add-ons.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-

User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7426
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: NoScript Suite "Lite"

Post by therube » Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:14 pm

> With NoScript installed or not?

Both actually.
Install in FF, not installed in SeaMonkey.

> addons you have already installed won't show up in Get Add-ons

I didn't know that. Especially since I've never used that feature before.
Anyhow, that doesn't make sense (to me).
But I guess it makes sense in Mozilla's mind, where they treat everyone like... well like MS treats its subjects.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.39

User avatar
Thrawn
Senior Member
Posts: 3106
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:46 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: NoScript Suite "Lite"

Post by Thrawn » Tue Jan 12, 2016 11:46 pm

For me, in a Firefox profile with NoScript installed, NoScript Security Suite doesn't show up on the Get Addons search for "noscript".

But in a clean profile, it's the #1 hit.
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.

True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0

Post Reply