http://www.ghacks.net/2015/07/21/firefo ... e-browser/
Will that affect NoScript's ability to block webfonts?
Will NoScript need change how it blocks fonts on Gecko 41?
Will NoScript need change how it blocks fonts on Gecko 41?
Last edited by barbaz on Thu Jul 23, 2015 12:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: change link because someone deleted the mozillaZine forum topic
Reason: change link because someone deleted the mozillaZine forum topic
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
Re: Will NoScript need change how it blocks fonts on Gecko 4
Link is broken for me.
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:39.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/39.0
Re: Will NoScript need change how it blocks fonts on Gecko 4
Weird, it's gone. Let me see if it's actually deleted or just reposted elsewhere...
EDIT OK found another thread on mozillaZine about this, but it's not informative at all so instead I just linked the article they linked.
EDIT OK found another thread on mozillaZine about this, but it's not informative at all so instead I just linked the article they linked.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
Re: Will NoScript need change how it blocks fonts on Gecko 4
I guess the burning question is, Do icon fonts present the same security risks as regular ones?
If so, the Ghacks article mentioned that they can be disabled with some extra steps, so I'm sure NoScript can handle it. Of course, it's possible that NoScript intercepts them at a different point in the process anyway and will be unchanged.
If so, the Ghacks article mentioned that they can be disabled with some extra steps, so I'm sure NoScript can handle it. Of course, it's possible that NoScript intercepts them at a different point in the process anyway and will be unchanged.
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:39.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/39.0
Re: Will NoScript need change how it blocks fonts on Gecko 4
Any Nightly testers around who can "just try it"? Preferably check both Fx and SeaMonkey. Thanks
(I'd check SM myself but I'm not able to test nightlies right now. Plus my build machines are kind of in need of major maintenance...
)
(I'd check SM myself but I'm not able to test nightlies right now. Plus my build machines are kind of in need of major maintenance...
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
Re: Will NoScript need change how it blocks fonts on Gecko 4
> "just try it"
Is there a page around, with the different types of fonts or whatever that describes what we're seeing, what should be seen, so we might know what if anything is being affected by changes in FF & or by NoScript?
Is there a page around, with the different types of fonts or whatever that describes what we're seeing, what should be seen, so we might know what if anything is being affected by changes in FF & or by NoScript?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33.1
Re: Will NoScript need change how it blocks fonts on Gecko 4
Github uses icon font.. any page will do, say this one https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/
Or look at Font Awesome: https://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/icons/ (<-- not a typo)
For "normal" (non-icon) webfonts, there's the Google fonts site, but I don't know if you'll need some special NoScript settings (e.g. "Apply these restrictions to whitelisted sites too") so that the fonts "would" be visible except for NoScript's font blocking...
Or look at Font Awesome: https://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/icons/ (<-- not a typo)
For "normal" (non-icon) webfonts, there's the Google fonts site, but I don't know if you'll need some special NoScript settings (e.g. "Apply these restrictions to whitelisted sites too") so that the fonts "would" be visible except for NoScript's font blocking...
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
Re: Will NoScript need change how it blocks fonts on Gecko 4
> https://www.google.com/fonts
When I didn't see anything, I knew I remembered something, Google Fonts site doesn't welcome Seamonkey.
Have to spoof your UA (removing mention of SeaMonkey).
When I didn't see anything, I knew I remembered something, Google Fonts site doesn't welcome Seamonkey.
Have to spoof your UA (removing mention of SeaMonkey).
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0 SeaMonkey/2.35
Re: Will NoScript need change how it blocks fonts on Gecko 4
Dated, so lets see if it stays alive or goes further, How to selectively block web fonts?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33.1
Re: Will NoScript need change how it blocks fonts on Gecko 4
They lock threads that are dead for 1 year or more that get posted to after that time period... don't expect it to last long.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-