ReferenceError: adblock_detected is not defined

[DanyR]

Hi,

when visiting http://www.naruget.net and trying to watch either episode, all I see is a black box instead of a video player. In the FireFox (V38.0.5) console i see the following entry:

ReferenceError: adblock_detected is not defined flownew_googplayer.php:60:47

referencing the 3rd line of this code block:

Code: Select all

   if(FlashDetect.installed){
      $f("flowplayer", {src:         "http://www.animeget.eu/cdn/flowplayer.commercial-3.2.7.1.swf", 
                        wmode:       'opaque', allowfullscreen:adblock_detected?'false':'true'}, 
                       {canvas:      {backgroundColor: 'transparent', backgroundGradient: 'none'},
                        showErrors:  false, 
                        onError:     function(errorCode) { if(errorCode == 303) $f().play(1); },
                        contextMenu: ["Videofun"], 
                        key:         "#$dd47bb6156e649699a5", 
						// custom play button
						play: {

I have also AdBlockPlus (ABP) installed (V2.6.9.1), but only after disabling NoScript (V2.6.9.27) completely lets me see the player.
ABP disabling or removal does not work and neither does setting NoScript to allow all scripts for every site. It seems to be something very deep down inside...

I'm using a new FF profile without NoScript for now to watch Naruto. Just wanted to let you guys know, so that you might improve your useful add-on even further

Cheers,
Dany

[barbaz]

Well, it is possible to work around the problem in this one case with the information you've given, but it would be helpful to know the root cause in case other sites are likewise affected.

Please check the Browser Console (Ctrl-Shift-J) when it fails and post here any NoScript related messages (will probably start with either "[NoScript" or "[ABE]"; if you don't know what's related, turn off CSS warnings and post everything else you see).

[DanyR]

Thanks for the help.

Now I'm beginning to see the problem. Looks like they are using bad extensions with wrong headers inside.

This is, what I get:

Code: Select all

[NoScript] Blocking cross-site Javascript served from http://www.animeget.eu/cdn/fun3.jsx with wrong type info application/octet-stream and included by http://online.narutoget.com/s/flownew_googplayer.php?flowid=dd47bb6156e649699a5&to=1002kEhprnVM&id=112100296851571938885/Nship410ut$6143487520688443954
[NoScript] Blocking cross-site Javascript served from http://www.animeget.eu/cdn/fun3.jsx with wrong type info application/octet-stream and included by http://online.narutoget.com/s/flownew_googplayer.php?flowid=dd47bb6156e649699a5&to=1002kEhprnVM&id=112100296851571938885/Nship410ut$6143487520688443954
ReferenceError: adblock_detected is not defined flownew_googplayer.php:60:47

[barbaz]

try:
about:config > add the following to noscript.inclusionTypeChecking.exceptions

Code: Select all

.animeget.eu/*.jsx

(rant: Why does "everyone" want to serve JavaScript files with .jsx extension, with the wrong content-type? Sure, .jsx is indeed a valid extension for JavaScript - it's an Adobe variant - but come on, at least serve it with type text/javascript or application/javascript...)

[DanyR]

Hey, thank you very much, works like a charm

After investigating the used code a bit further, I saw a fall-back when flash is not installed to use a video tag instead. Why don't they swap to HTML5 for good?

And you are completely right with your "rant".

[barbaz]

Hey, thank you very much, works like a charm

np

Why don't they swap to HTML5 for good?

I'd guess something like, because not all browser support HTML5 video equally well - and they might be trying to still support, say, IE 8 or some REALLY old Firefox which have zero support for HTML5 video and they're being smart about how they do it in that they're not using UA sniffing..

[DanyR]

Hehe, very smart indeed!

[Thrawn]

(rant: Why does "everyone" want to serve JavaScript files with .jsx extension, with the wrong content-type? Sure, .jsx is indeed a valid extension for JavaScript - it's an Adobe variant - but come on, at least serve it with type text/javascript or application/javascript...)

Perhaps it isn't in the standard (eg Apache) mimetype lists?

[barbaz]

Perhaps it isn't in the standard (eg Apache) mimetype lists?

Yeah, seems not (apparently, my server wants to serve .jsx with content-type "text/plain" if I don't go in and add .jsx extension to /etc/mime.types as javascript).