*** EDIT: [b][color=red]This post might be totally irrelevant, see below[/color][/b] ***
No issues here, posting anon.
(originally posted in NoScript Support, as anon, then merged here)
I did need to enter the captcha (which basically blew me away, though it did accept a 3-char number).
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 SeaMonkey/2.29
Thanks for checking. Given that, I could only think of one possible reason for triggering the spam filter - so I decided to try changing my User-Agent to what you show on your anon post, Previewed a post with the "offending" BBCode (which didn't work before), and that got it. So I think I'll keep my UA for this site that way for a bit, if you don't mind
So I guess what I'm requesting is: Please don't make the spam filter stricter on OpenBSD users. TIA
EDIT Nope, that's apparently not it - seems it's something about that specific post that, when combined with font color usage, makes it look like spam...
I'm still keeping the UA string for a bit though.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 SeaMonkey/2.29
Tom T. wrote:...Nor should a size or color tag, at least for registered users. There may be additional restrictions for guest posters in that regard, but I don't remember it coming up as an issue.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 SeaMonkey/2.29