Thank you mucho for NoScript. I love it!!!
Suggest that you implement Webutation as the choice for checking (middle click) the integrity of a script provider. Webutation checks several reputation sites including WOT and it provides access to those sites for further information. If not too much work allow the user to choose Webutation or WOT as the default.
Thanks again
WOT vs. Webutation
WOT vs. Webutation
Last edited by mountney on Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 Iceweasel/20.0
Re: WOT vs. Webutation
(I believe you may be able to set up your own service engine if your wanted one is not there already.)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.23
Re: WOT vs. Webutation
Hmm... I don't find in the options menu anything provides to me, the user, being able to change middel-click behavior...
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 Iceweasel/20.0
Re: WOT vs. Webutation
about:config -> modify noscript.siteInfoProvider
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26a1
-
Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9530
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: WOT vs. Webutation
and just change its value tobarbaz wrote:about:config -> modify noscript.siteInfoProvider
Code: Select all
http://www.webutations.net/go/review/%utf8%
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0