Giorgio Maone wrote:GµårÐïåñ wrote:Both are accessed via bookmarks.
It's a bug, then. Investigating...
Thank you, that's what I thought so why I brought it up. This is just one case, there are several I have experienced since the start, I just figured work in progress.
What's secure? they seem both plain HTTP (unless you're using some proprietary encryption protocol, which would be weird however).
Well that's another reason this bugs me, the site is HTTPS but ABE message shows a post request from HTTP, something that was weird to me as well. The router creates a hash for the session which identifies the router, then sends it to an HTTPS site for verification of the update package which is a .net of the same site and then it gets rerouted back using the HTTP .com version of the site using the hash to deliver the message back to the router. Not the most elegant, but works and we have established through extensive testing, its secure.
Of course, that's expected.
It's just like Local Rodeo: sites outsite your intranet are not allowed to link to sites placed in your LAN (e.g. a router).
If you didn't have the same issue when you used Local Rodeo, it just means Local Rodeo was too buggy to catch this situation.
Yes, accessing a secure LAN from outside is prohibited, no problem but as you can see below its doing it on the way out now, the in part, I am ok with and had no problem with, its the outgoing that I have an issue with. The incoming was given as a case example so you can see with the exception placed, it will generate the outgoing message. I had gone through all this, but for the sake of the community and making sure we don't miss a step, I figured we start from the beginning and you can tell me what I have already done so I know I did it right and we can resolve through it.
Why? Shouldn't you just have your "secure" external gateway listed in the From clause?
Maybe I should have been more clear, the list is growing because this is not the only site that has the issue, it was provided as a single example for discussion. This and then another and then another and by the end of the day we are looking at tens of exceptions for various sites, that WILL have a performance issue, I promise you. Right now the anecdotal evidence is too little and the usage is not as heavy by everyone because they don't get how it works or frankly not stable enough for anyone to try yet but those of us actually putting it through the ringer are seeing it. Just think how many entries in your changelog read "performance improvement", I am sure you have seen it too.
Code: Select all
[ABE] <LOCAL> Deny on {GET http://gateway.2wire.net/net/stat/status.html?command=0&next=http://gateway.cms.2wire.com/hp/kickResult%3Fsessionid%3Dbc1IGarSH5kg <<< http://gateway.cms.2wire.com/hp/upgrade/showUpgrades.do, http://gateway.cms.2wire.com/hp/upgrade/showUpgrades.do}
It seems exactly the same request as the first you reported, i.e. gateway.cms.2wire.com (external) originating a request to gateway.2wire.net (internal). Am I missing something?
Exactly, I am glad you noticed that. So why is the same message that was generated on the incoming get generated on the outgoing with the exception rule in place?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11