??? ABE VS Chrome`s Site Isolation

Ask for help about NoScript, no registration needed to post
User avatar
江3如此多娇
Junior Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:38 am

??? ABE VS Chrome`s Site Isolation

Post by 江3如此多娇 »

I found the Site Isolation described in below links is a little bit similar to ABE in concept.
App Isolation and Chrome`s Site Isolation

I wonder whether the ABE rules are similar to the 2 key properties in multi-browser?
-ABE: Accept from Entry-Points
-ABE: Anon from Outside-Isolated-App

PS: I`m a crazy NS-fan :lol:
Last edited by 江3如此多娇 on Fri May 24, 2013 3:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20130517 Firefox/24.0
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9557
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: ??? ABE VS Chrome`s Site Isolation

Post by Giorgio Maone »

Yes, you can achieve the same goals as Chrome's Site Isolation by using restrictive ABE rules.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/21.0
User avatar
Thrawn
Master Bug Buster
Posts: 3106
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:46 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: ??? ABE VS Chrome`s Site Isolation

Post by Thrawn »

Actually, it's a pity that the 'App Isolation' authors apparently didn't know about ABE. Really, they should have acknowledged it as "prior work".
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0
User avatar
江3如此多娇
Junior Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:38 am

Re: ??? ABE VS Chrome`s Site Isolation

Post by 江3如此多娇 »

Thrawn wrote:Actually, it's a pity that the 'App Isolation' authors apparently didn't know about ABE. Really, they should have acknowledged it as "prior work".
I agree, actually, i think the method is very similar to ABE, such as opt-in policy :lol:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20130523 Firefox/24.0
Post Reply