Hi folks. I'm experimenting with a defaults/preferences/autoconfig.js:
pref("general.config.obscure_value", 0);
pref("general.config.filename", "FirefoxCfg.js");
approach to setting up Firefox 16.0.2. Within FirefoxCfg.js I'm using LockPref to set everything the way I want it. I'm considering the potential benefits of CAPS and at present have two test entries:
lockPref("capability.policy.default.Window.postMessage.get", "sameOrigin");
lockPref("capability.policy.default.XMLHttpRequest.open", "sameOrigin");
but I'm still trying to think CAPS usage through. So far I haven't noticed this approach interfering with NoScript's operation but I thought I better check with you guys to see if the use of lockPref, particularly the lockPrefing of a CAPS entry, might cause problems for NoScript. Is anyone doing this? Comments? Thanks in advance.
Any issues using autoconfig, lockPref, CAPS?
-
ItsColdOut
Any issues using autoconfig, lockPref, CAPS?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: Any issues using autoconfig, lockPref, CAPS?
Yes, using CAPS interferes with NoScript and there's no easy work-around.
Notice also that since the only significant CAPS client to-date is NoScript, CAPS feature which are not required by NoScript operation are being slowly removed from the Mozilla code base.
Notice also that since the only significant CAPS client to-date is NoScript, CAPS feature which are not required by NoScript operation are being slowly removed from the Mozilla code base.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0