I see .Thanks !GµårÐïåñ wrote:HE is not Chinese and as the handle suggests "therube" he is full blooded American from somewhere in the good old east of the midwest in Maryland somewhere. Posting in Chinese doesn't help him and I understand it because I've been a Marine for 15+ years. @therube, correct me if I am wrong.royallin wrote:Re GµårÐïåñ:
Thanks for the translation,it's pretty good.![]()
Because of the video by therube,so i think he or she is a chinese,so i want to share the forum with.
A bug of flashblock function
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; zh-CN; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Firefox/3.6.99 (PGO)
Re: A bug of flashblock function
application/x-iframe@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/x-<iframe>@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/iframe@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/<iframe>@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/IFRAME@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/<IFRAME>@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/x-IFRAME@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/x-<IFRAME>@https?://www\.example\.com
The rules don't work,why?
or
application/x-<iframe>@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/iframe@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/<iframe>@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/IFRAME@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/<IFRAME>@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/x-IFRAME@https?://www\.example\.com
or
application/x-<IFRAME>@https?://www\.example\.com
The rules don't work,why?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; zh-CN; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Firefox/3.6.99 (PGO)
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9530
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Because IFRAME is a HTML tag, not a MIME content type identifier.royallin wrote: The rules don't work,why?
Supposing the frame is loading an html document, you need something like
Code: Select all
text/html@https?://www\.example\.com
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0
Re: A bug of flashblock function
The website:Giorgio Maone wrote:Because IFRAME is a HTML tag, not a MIME content type identifier.royallin wrote: The rules don't work,why?
Supposing the frame is loading an html document, you need something like
Code: Select all
text/html@https?://www\.example\.com
http://pan.baidu.com/share/link?shareid ... 2684733227
GIF record
http://imgur.com/K0uZl
application/x-rar-compressed@https?://pan\.baidu\.com
or
application/x-rar-compressed@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com
or
text/html@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com
even
*@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com
don't work.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; zh-CN; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Firefox/3.6.99 (PGO)
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9530
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: A bug of flashblock function
My bad, allowedMimeRegexp works only for plugin content, not for frames.
I'll see if I can make it work in next release.
I'll see if I can make it work in next release.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9530
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Please check latest development build 2.5.9rc2, FRAME@https?://my.site.com should work now 
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Thank you.The 2.5.9rc2 was tested.But something confused me.Giorgio Maone wrote:Please check latest development build 2.5.9rc2, FRAME@https?://my.site.com should work now
Forbid<IFRAME> was checked.
Forbid<FRAME> didn't checded.
but
FRAME@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com work
IFRAME@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com don't work
PS:How about add "allways allow xxxx@http://my.wesite.com" to the menu of status bar icon ,not just "temporarily allow..."
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Firefox/3.6.99 (PGO)
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9530
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: A bug of flashblock function
FRAME works for both IFRAMEs an FRAMEs (they're equivalent security-wise, so there's little or no point to differentiate them further).royallin wrote: FRAME@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com work
IFRAME@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com don't work
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Thank youGiorgio Maone wrote:FRAME works for both IFRAMEs an FRAMEs (they're equivalent security-wise, so there's little or no point to differentiate them further).royallin wrote: FRAME@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com work
IFRAME@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com don't work
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; zh-CN; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Firefox/3.6.99 (PGO)