Fx 16.0b5, NS 2.5.6rc1+, new profile, block iframes on trusted
compare https://login.live.com/login.srf?id=2 between 2.5.5 and 2.5.6rc1
2.5.6rc1 regression: placeholder positioning/spacing
2.5.6rc1 regression: placeholder positioning/spacing
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9527
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: 2.5.6rc1 regression: placeholder positioning/spacing
Fixed in latest development build 2.5.7rc2, thanks.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1
Re: 2.5.6rc1 regression: placeholder positioning/spacing
Just to note, the build is there, just not reflected on the webpage, https://secure.informaction.com/downloa ... 5.7rc2.xpi.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14a2
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9527
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: 2.5.6rc1 regression: placeholder positioning/spacing
Fixed, thanks.therube wrote:Just to note, the build is there, just not reflected on the webpage, https://secure.informaction.com/downloa ... 5.7rc2.xpi.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1
Re: 2.5.6rc1 regression: placeholder positioning/spacing
a related regression that's not resolved by 2.5.7.rc2:
compare a google translated iframe (activated and loaded)
compare a google translated iframe (activated and loaded)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9527
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: 2.5.6rc1 regression: placeholder positioning/spacing
Fixed in latest development build 2.5.7rc3, thanks.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1
Re: 2.5.6rc1 regression: placeholder positioning/spacing
another regression, in google image search results (click on an image from the results list/table) the image used to be on top of the placeholder, now it's below, obscured by it.Giorgio Maone wrote:Fixed in latest development build 2.5.7rc3, thanks.
The zorder change may be intentional but in this case the old way was definitely better. Can it be made smarter or optional?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0
- GµårÐïåñ
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 3370
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
- Location: PST - USA
- Contact:
Re: 2.5.6rc1 regression: placeholder positioning/spacing
Not always, so it would be a pretty ugly hack.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
world is a vampire and browsers are zombies and users are the virus
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9527
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: 2.5.6rc1 regression: placeholder positioning/spacing
In this case maybe, but definitely not.al_9x wrote: The zorder change may be intentional but in this case the old way was definitely better.
The change (relocating the placeholder on top if its central part is obscured by something else) has been made because Youtube started placing its custom placeholders for HTML 5 videos over the video element, and therefore of the placeholder, obscuring it completely.
While you can easily remove the placeholder (shift+click) and anyway see through it if it's on top, if it's on bottom you're just left with broken content and no obvious way to unlock it (until you look at the Blocked Objects submenu, but it's not obvious for most people).
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1