How about "Temp. enable [url] on this tab only"?

Ask for help about NoScript, no registration needed to post
Kiba
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:18 am

How about "Temp. enable [url] on this tab only"?

Post by Kiba »

Google continues to wend its way, into more and more sites as they seek to track every move their users make.

Normally, I keep google.com ALWAYS forbidden - especially when doing searches.

When I use Gmail, however, it is necessary to allow google.com temporarily.

I have already set the options so that existing search tabs don't reload when I enable google.com for Gmail, so my question is NOT about reloading.

Instead, I would like google.com to be allowed for the ONE tab that has Gmail, but NOT allowed on ANY other tabs - existing or yet to be opened - so that, when I do searches, those pages do NOT come up with my Gmail name, but so they think I still need to log in.

Any ideas? Can NoScript do this? If not, is there something else (maybe a GreaseMonkey script) that can do it?

Thanks!
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1
dhouwn
Bug Buster
Posts: 968
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:51 pm

Re: How about "Temp. enable [url] on this tab only"?

Post by dhouwn »

If you logged into Google, then you are logged in into Google (and therefore you will e.g. get personalized Google search), no matter whether scripts are allowed or not AFAIK.
What matters are cookies, you might be able to do something with the "Anonymize" command of ABE, get some add-on that gives you precise cookie-controlling power (e.g. depending on the top-level site), or going even further have an entirely separate browser profile for Gmail.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0
Kiba
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:18 am

Re: How about "Temp. enable [url] on this tab only"?

Post by Kiba »

Thank you for your reply. You have pretty much confirmed what I had thought. I also did look for GreaseMonkey scripts that could do the trick, but didn't find any.

The idea of using a different browser is probably the best, easiest and most-secure solution. For now, I'll try just using Epiphany for Gmail and keep Firefox for everything else. If Epiphany doesn't work out, for some reason, I'll try Chromium or Chrome.

EDIT:
For the record, Chromium handled adblocking, etc. better than Epiphany did, so I'm now keeping a separate Chromium window open, just for Gmail, and doing all the rest of my browsing in Firefox so Google searches will NEVER pick up on my Gmail login.

Thanks again!
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1
dhouwn
Bug Buster
Posts: 968
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:51 pm

Re: How about "Temp. enable [url] on this tab only"?

Post by dhouwn »

Do as you choose, I certainly wouldn't want to miss NoScript, even when just for Gmail (which I BTW access through a mail-client, yes I am that old-fashioned, people preferring webmails is one of the reasons Mozilla today announced that they are not going to invest much in Thunderbird anymore).
Oh, and speaking of secure solutions, you might want to update your Firefox.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0
Kiba
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:18 am

Re: How about "Temp. enable [url] on this tab only"?

Post by Kiba »

Actually, I do most of my email via Thunderbird, but have a few Gmail accounts for which I prefer to use the web interface.

As long as my Thunderbird will still work, I'll keep using it. I certainly won't switch to Outlook just because Thunderbird development stops. Well, I can't, anyway, since Outlook won't run on Linux (unless, perhaps, I were to use Wine, but the whole purpose of using Linux is NOT to use Windows - Wine or not).

As for old fashioned, I've been in the industry for 34 years and used to do email from the Unix command line until I started using Elm (which also let me edit the emails with vi).

Who knows? I may decide to use a client for these other accounts, after a while. I just don't want to add them to my current Thunderbird because I have so many in there already.

I'll update Firefox soon. Just haven't done the build, yet. Since Debian is always behind on Iceweasel and Icedove, I just bagged those a long time ago and compile the latest Firefox and Thunderbird myself.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1
Kiba
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:18 am

Re: How about "Temp. enable [url] on this tab only"?

Post by Kiba »

Firefox now updated. :)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7991
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: How about "Temp. enable [url] on this tab only"?

Post by therube »

Wouldn't ABE work for that, allowing google.com, only at gmail.com & nowhere else?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120716 Firefox/15.0a2 SeaMonkey/2.12a2
User avatar
Thrawn
Master Bug Buster
Posts: 3106
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:46 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: How about "Temp. enable [url] on this tab only"?

Post by Thrawn »

therube wrote:Wouldn't ABE work for that, allowing google.com, only at gmail.com & nowhere else?
Yes, it would. So would RequestPolicy, if you're willing to go the whole hog and control all cross-site requests.
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.

True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1
Post Reply