noscript update wonky, need previous version

Ask for help about NoScript, no registration needed to post
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3377
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: noscript update wonky, need previous version

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

If only my manufacturer would look that good supporting me, I would be a happier hacker :twisted:
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.152 Safari/535.19 Comodo_Dragon/18.1.2.0
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: noscript update wonky, need previous version

Post by Tom T. »

GµårÐïåñ wrote:If only my manufacturer would look that good supporting me, I would be a happier hacker :twisted:
Surely an advanced hacker like yourself knows how to put whatever image is desired in that box, in place of a dull OEM logo ... :D
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Firefox/12.0
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3377
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: noscript update wonky, need previous version

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

Of course silly, I was just having a little fun...pre-vista you put it in the system32 folder now you have to do it in the registry but the basic files are all the same. ish.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.152 Safari/535.19 Comodo_Dragon/18.1.2.0
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: noscript update wonky, need previous version

Post by Tom T. »

GµårÐïåñ wrote:Of course silly, I was just having a little fun...pre-vista you put it in the system32 folder now you have to do it in the registry but the basic files are all the same. ish.
Another "regression" in Vista. :mrgreen: -- no messing with the registry to change OEM logo in XP. 8-)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Firefox/12.0
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3377
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: noscript update wonky, need previous version

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

Correct, the OEM info was in an ini/inf file before now the logo files are in the the same place but the information is coded in the registry, as part of the pre-coding by manufacturers, loading a registry payload was deemed easier for branding purposes, personally I always wipe and clean install any machine I get anyway, so never been an issue for me. If I am doing it for people, I put the support information needed for them to get a hold of ME for help, but that's about it. I have a slip script for both, so it takes seconds but yeah arguments can be made for/against both methods.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: noscript update wonky, need previous version

Post by Tom T. »

GµårÐïåñ wrote:the OEM info was in an ini/inf file before now the logo files are in the the same place but the information is coded in the registry...
The info and support info, yes, but the logo was simply a system32 file called oemlogo.bmp -- for which any .bmp can be substituted. :twisted:
GµårÐïåñ wrote:... loading a registry payload was deemed easier for branding purposes...arguments can be made for/against both methods.
I think you mean, "harder for users to remove the brand logo". :evil:

I don't see any argument "for", except for the one above. ;)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Firefox/12.0
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3377
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: noscript update wonky, need previous version

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

That's what I said, the file is still there, the information is in the registry instead of the setup file. And I meant easier for the vendors not the users.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.168 Safari/535.19 Comodo_Dragon/18.3.0.0
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: noscript update wonky, need previous version

Post by Tom T. »

GµårÐïåñ wrote:.... And I meant easier for the vendors not the users.
LOL Gotcha. :lol:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Firefox/12.0
Post Reply