Looking at and tweaking the source for troubleshooting purposes would be easier without it.
Is noscript.jar still needed for gecko < 2?
Is noscript.jar still needed for gecko < 2?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0.1
Re: Is noscript.jar still needed for gecko < 2?
I wonder if this would increase the file size, since AFAIK in the ZIP format each file is compressed for itself.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0
Re: Is noscript.jar still needed for gecko < 2?
noscript.jar is not compressed
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0.1
Re: Is noscript.jar still needed for gecko < 2?
Exactly, because otherwise you would try to compress it twice. But what it does is that it merges many files into one and therefore the size decrease of the compressed jar file might be higher than what you would get if you compressed each file separately.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_compression
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_compression
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9527
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: Is noscript.jar still needed for gecko < 2?
Not "might", but "does".dhouwn wrote: the size decrease of the compressed jar file might be higher than what you would get if you compressed each file separately
The zero-compression jar has been kept so far just to reduce the XPI size.
However it has already gone away in NoScript 3 (which is smaller anyway because removes tons of legacy/compatibility code).
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0
Re: Is noscript.jar still needed for gecko < 2?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Firefox/5.0 SeaMonkey/2.2