Using Firefox 4.01, My NoScript is configured to auto-update. Today morning when the system was started, NoScript had auto-updated from the latest stable build, 2.1.1.1 to a development build, (release-candidate,) 2.1.1.2rc1.
Though I'm quite OK with using beta programs, would like to bring these surprising points to your notice:-
01.) It's quite unprecedented that NoScript has auto-updated to a build not yet declared as stable.
02.) Moreover, instead of auto-updating to the latest development build 2.1.1.2rc3, it has elected to opt for a build 2 stages older . . . . . . 2.1.1.2rc1.
The above behavior is 100% reproducible - even if one does a manual install of the latest stable 2.1.1.1, NoScript insists on updating to the development build, 2.1.1.2rc1 . . . . . . . . even now.
[RESOLVED] "Stable 2.1.1.1 Auto Updates To Beta 2.1.1.2rc1"
[RESOLVED] "Stable 2.1.1.1 Auto Updates To Beta 2.1.1.2rc1"
Last edited by Tom T. on Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: mark as resolved
Reason: mark as resolved
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1
Re: "Stable 2.1.1.1 Auto Updates To Beta 2.1.1.2rc1"
That is indeed an issue because now people are on the RC versions path and will go on a rant that NoScript updates too often unless Giorgio does something about it like making all users update to the next stable version (which [accidentally?] happened several times the past if I remember correctly).
AFAIK, Giorgio tests all releases the same so from this standpoint these versions are not any less stable (therefore they all are "release candidates"); but on the other hand, that's where new features get introduced first and so unforeseen consequences (things Giorgio might have not considered and that did not show up in his testing) might more likely become visible there.
AFAIK, Giorgio tests all releases the same so from this standpoint these versions are not any less stable (therefore they all are "release candidates"); but on the other hand, that's where new features get introduced first and so unforeseen consequences (things Giorgio might have not considered and that did not show up in his testing) might more likely become visible there.
Last edited by dhouwn on Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9454
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: "Stable 2.1.1.1 Auto Updates To Beta 2.1.1.2rc1"
I filed this bug report some hours ago, not sure about the extent of the consequences yet (see the end of my comment there).
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1
Re: "Stable 2.1.1.1 Auto Updates To Beta 2.1.1.2rc1"
Thank you for the prompt response - believed that I was the only one to have been affected. Personally, no complaints from my end - the 2.1.1.2rc3 has been well-behaved on my system.
All said, I wouldn't mind using your development builds from this point, onwards - a big thanks to you for the lovely NoScript releases, over these years.
Wish you all the very best - thanks again.
All said, I wouldn't mind using your development builds from this point, onwards - a big thanks to you for the lovely NoScript releases, over these years.
Wish you all the very best - thanks again.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1
Re: "Stable 2.1.1.1 Auto Updates To Beta 2.1.1.2rc1"
You're not the only one, after 2.1.1.1 stable I got rc1 recently as well(also when rc3 was already released) and now it just updated to rc4.
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; en) Presto/2.8.131 Version/11.11
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9454
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: "Stable 2.1.1.1 Auto Updates To Beta 2.1.1.2rc1"
If you don't want to stay on the beta channel, you must opt-out, I'm afraid, by explicitly downgrading to 2.1.1.1.Boelie wrote:You're not the only one, after 2.1.1.1 stable I got rc1 recently as well(also when rc3 was already released) and now it just updated to rc4.
This is an unfortunate consequence of this AMO bug
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1
Re: "Stable 2.1.1.1 Auto Updates To Beta 2.1.1.2rc1"
Giorgio Maone wrote:If you don't want to stay on the beta channel, you must opt-out, I'm afraid, by explicitly downgrading to 2.1.1.1.
This is an unfortunate consequence of this AMO bug
Can this sticky now be removed? One user expressed concern that too many stickies clutter the board, and make current, topical ones less visible.Bug 663780 - NoScript 2.1.1.2rc1 (meant for the beta channel) is being served in the stable channel
Summary: NoScript 2.1.1.2rc1 (meant for the beta channel) is being served in the stabl...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
I agree with that viewpoint.
This also applies to the sticky on Firefox 4, which is also obsolete.
Thanks.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.25) Gecko/20111212 Firefox/3.6.25
Re: "Stable 2.1.1.1 Auto Updates To Beta 2.1.1.2rc1"
Bump.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:22.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/22.0