Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.1
Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.1
On the WebGL test apps I am working on, the console.log() function does not print anything* to Firebug's console anymore since the latest update for NoScript got installed. If I disable NoScript and restart the apps, they both print the log correctly.
*Note: console.log(); does not seem to display anything but GET's intercepted by Firebug do show up on the console.
*Note: console.log(); does not seem to display anything but GET's intercepted by Firebug do show up on the console.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9524
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
Does this imply that downgrading actually cures the symptom?Panajev wrote:since the latest update for NoScript got installed.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
Does this imply that downgrading actually cures the symptom?[/quote]Giorgio Maone wrote:[quote="Panajev"since the latest update for NoScript got installed.
Well... arg... did not try to downgrade it (I did not even think of doing that since it worked yesterday before the NoScript update and it did not work today just after I restarted Firefox with the NoScript update applied)

Last edited by Panajev on Fri Apr 01, 2011 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
Ok, yes... it does imply that
.

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9524
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
Is this specific to your app or a simple HTML page with a console.log() statement shows the same issue?
Does the Error Console display any error message?
Does the Error Console display any error message?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
I see this:
Edit:
even this page shows the same issue:
Code: Select all
Error: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x805e0006 [nsIDOMLocation.href]" nsresult: "0x805e0006 (<unknown>)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://noscript/content/ScriptSurrogate.js :: <TOP_LEVEL> :: line 203" data: no]
Source File: chrome://noscript/content/ScriptSurrogate.js
Line: 203
even this page shows the same issue:
Code: Select all
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title>t</title>
<meta name="generator" content="Studio 3 http://aptana.com/">
<meta name="author" content="Goffredo Marocchi">
<!-- Date: 2011-04-01 -->
</head>
<body>
<script type="text/javascript">
console.log("...........................");
</script>
</body>
</html>
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9524
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
Could you check latest development build?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
The only error I get with this development version, that might be related to that (or maybe not), is this:Giorgio Maone wrote:Could you check latest development build?
Code: Select all
Error: this.childNodes[i].tab is undefined
Source File: chrome://browser/content/tabbrowser.xml
Line: 3599
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
Do you have any update on this issue? Firebug is not really usable in this state...
...

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
Upgraded to the latest NoScript release and I still see this issue.
Boot Firefox, open tab, load webpage, see output in the web console only but no Firebug log anymore. This did not happen with that previous NoScript release as I mentioned before.
Do you have any update on this issue?
Boot Firefox, open tab, load webpage, see output in the web console only but no Firebug log anymore. This did not happen with that previous NoScript release as I mentioned before.
Do you have any update on this issue?
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:50 am
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
Hi @ All,
I have exactly the same Problem! Your FAQ says that noscript.forbidData set to true in about:config helps but not for me! http://noscript.net/faq#qa3_14
But it seems to be the same Problem because i get a <system> message in Firebug with linkage to a funktion named "httpRequestObserver".
Deleting Firefox & Reinstall it with no Add-Ons but NoScript and new Firefox Profile not help. Is is since last week i guess from the latest update of NoScript.
Thanks GreG
I have exactly the same Problem! Your FAQ says that noscript.forbidData set to true in about:config helps but not for me! http://noscript.net/faq#qa3_14
But it seems to be the same Problem because i get a <system> message in Firebug with linkage to a funktion named "httpRequestObserver".
Deleting Firefox & Reinstall it with no Add-Ons but NoScript and new Firefox Profile not help. Is is since last week i guess from the latest update of NoScript.
Thanks GreG
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
I think I am having the same issue. console.log and all console.x commands produce no output after upgrading to NoScript 2.1.
Steps to reproduce:
1) Load Firefox 4.0 with Firebug 1.7 or later and NoScript 2.1 or later.
2) Go to google.com
3) Type console.log('hi'); into the command box and run it
4) Both the expression evaluated and the resulting output are printed
5) Hit F5 to reload the page
6) Type console.log('hi'); into the command box and run it
7 Only the expression evaluated statement is printed. No output is generated from the invocation of console.log
Alternatively, loading javascript with any console.x from any page also produces no output at any time. Once the console is "broken" in this manner, it can be temporarily fixed by selecting Deactivate Firebug for this Website, and then clicking the bug icon to activate it again. Console output from commands entered into the command box will work until the page is refreshed. Other events, like GET requests, appear in Firebug's log normally even when the problem with the console is occurring.
This happens with Firebug 1.7 and 1.7.1b1 and Noscript 2.1 and above, including 2.1.0.2rc6. Downgrading to NoScript 2.0.9.9 fixes it. Disabling NoScript also allows the console to work normally in Firebug.
Steps to reproduce:
1) Load Firefox 4.0 with Firebug 1.7 or later and NoScript 2.1 or later.
2) Go to google.com
3) Type console.log('hi'); into the command box and run it
4) Both the expression evaluated and the resulting output are printed
Code: Select all
>>> console.log('hi');
hi
6) Type console.log('hi'); into the command box and run it
7 Only the expression evaluated statement is printed. No output is generated from the invocation of console.log
Code: Select all
>>> console.log('hi');
This happens with Firebug 1.7 and 1.7.1b1 and Noscript 2.1 and above, including 2.1.0.2rc6. Downgrading to NoScript 2.0.9.9 fixes it. Disabling NoScript also allows the console to work normally in Firebug.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
Same issue here. Firebug console does nothing on page load with NoScript 2.1 installed. I was able to get it to work, though impractically, by deactivating Firebug, then reactivating it for the page. At that point I could actually evaluate JS in the console but it was a real pain.
Found this thread and downgraded to 2.0.9.9, now the console works fine as before.
Found this thread and downgraded to 2.0.9.9, now the console works fine as before.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
This happens with any output in the console, not just console.log. even just a simple string "test" results in nothing.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0a1) Gecko/20110518 Firefox/6.0a1
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 10:56 am
Re: Nasty Firebug's console.log() issue with NoScript 2.1.0.
Also seen on MacOSX 10.6.7, Firefox 4.0.1, NoScript 2.1.0.5, Firebug 1.7.1 visiting various sites, including http://www.nature.com
Disabling Noscript got Firebug working again for me.
dunno if this is useful:
Switching NoScript to block the site got me:
Firebug cannot find firebug-CommandLineAttached document.getUserData , its too early for command line Window [www.nature.com]
[Edit] - Retested with 2.0.9.9 - works fine, 2.1.0 - same issue as described.
Rolling back for now...
Disabling Noscript got Firebug working again for me.
dunno if this is useful:
Switching NoScript to block the site got me:
Firebug cannot find firebug-CommandLineAttached document.getUserData , its too early for command line Window [www.nature.com]
[Edit] - Retested with 2.0.9.9 - works fine, 2.1.0 - same issue as described.
Rolling back for now...
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1