So does that mean that this problem IS with NS/ABE and I should wait for the next update?Giorgio Maone wrote:Yes, it's an IPV6 address that looks like belonging to an address range reserved for private (LAN) usage.therube wrote:I thought that was an IPv6 address?
(Searches say, "www.exactaudiocopy.de has two IP numbers ...".)
However I've looked more closely into this issue, and it seems to actually be a subnetting issue in ABE's local IP checking code.
In fact, while fe80::::feeb:816e would have been a proper link-local address, fe80::21d:92ff:feeb:816e is not, because it falls out the fe80::/64 range set aside for autoconfiguration.
This is going to be fixed in next dev build.
Blocking of EAC
Re: Blocking of EAC
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13 FlyPaper/RC1 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Re: Blocking of EAC
> So does that mean that this problem IS with NS/ABE and I should wait for the next update?
Yes.
Yes.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.17) Gecko/20110123 SeaMonkey/2.0.12
Re: Blocking of EAC
/me wonders when this bug would have been found if sites weren't be preparing for IPv6 day.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b12pre) Gecko/20110209 Firefox/4.0b12pre
Re: Blocking of EAC
I recall that I recently added/enabled IPv6 support to WinXP SP3. I wonder if that had anything to do with my problem with EAC site?dhouwn wrote:/me wonders when this bug would have been found if sites weren't be preparing for IPv6 day.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13 FlyPaper/RC1 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
-
Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9526
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: Blocking of EAC
Fixed in latest development build, thanks.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13