I'd also like to see NoScript for Opera. I prefer and normally use Opera as I find it much faster and more secure than firefox, NoScript would make it almost perfect.
Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.6.37 Version/10.70
I looked at those this morning.
The API look significantly better than Chrome's, but there's still some hard to work-around obstacle, especially in the inter-process messaging API, which is strictly asynchronous: NoScript's content-side component would need to exchange information synchronously with the background process at least once per page, in order to reliably apply its security policies.
christarzan wrote:The inter-process messaging API, is strictly asynchronous, I want it to synchronize atleast once per website
That's HTML5 Cross-Document messaging for you. Also you just don't want extensions to be synchronous and lock down your browser.
Since it was said by one of Opera Software employees I think they're not planning to change that.
Then they won't have a reliable/usable NoScript any time soon (just like it happens with Chrome, where NotScripts is not as reliable nor usable as NoScript for similar reasons).
there was already a script blocking extension available when 11alpha got released yesterday. Not bad for a beginning, even if just based on white/black list... okay that's basic but better than nothing.
Logos wrote:there was already a script blocking extension available when 11alpha got released yesterday. Not bad for a beginning, even if just based on white/black list... okay that's basic but better than nothing.
Mmm, I've looked into the source code and it seems Opera actually is in a better shape than Chrome again, thanks to its user scripts API which allows for isolated storage in privileged content-process scripts.
Still very impractical if compared with Firefox's infrastructure, but not as desperate as Chrome.