[Resolved] FF with NoScript wakes up hibernated NAS

Ask for help about NoScript, no registration needed to post
jto

[Resolved] FF with NoScript wakes up hibernated NAS

Post by jto »

Starting Firefox 3.6.10 with NoScript 2.0.3.2 enabled wakes up my Synology Diskstation NAS which is located in the local network. Disabling NoScript prevents the NAS from waking up.
Is NoScript sending broadcasts? I don't see any options regarding network settings. The NAS' IP is not in the whitelist. What can I do?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: FF with NoScript wakes up hibernated NAS

Post by therube »

If I had to guess it would be FlashGot.exe.
If you change your downloader to Brower Built In, does the same occur?
(Could be when you downloader opens that it is enumerating the NAS.)

Can't say I've noticed anything similar with local fixed (but otherwise sleeping) drives?
(Though it could be that normal activity had them awake anyhow?)

(It is typical for DOS applications to poll devices, awakening them.)

Let Sleeping Dogs Lie
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20100930 SeaMonkey/2.0.9
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: FF with NoScript wakes up hibernated NAS

Post by therube »

Plugged in a (WDC) USB HDD.
Went to sleep.
FlashGot'ing (or FlashGot Media, regardless of download manager) did not cause USB HDD to awaken.


(Which Synology do you have? Like it? Easy to configure? Can it do FTP?)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20100930 SeaMonkey/2.0.9
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9524
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: FF with NoScript wakes up hibernated NAS

Post by Giorgio Maone »

jto wrote:Starting Firefox 3.6.10 with NoScript 2.0.3.2 enabled wakes up my Synology Diskstation NAS which is located in the local network. Disabling NoScript prevents the NAS from waking up.
Is NoScript sending broadcasts? I don't see any options regarding network settings. The NAS' IP is not in the whitelist. What can I do?
Does your NAS respond on your WAN IP too, at least from your LAN? If it does, this may be http://noscript.net/abe/wan
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10
Guest

Re: FF with NoScript wakes up hibernated NAS

Post by Guest »

therube wrote:If I had to guess it would be FlashGot.exe.
If you change your downloader to Brower Built In, does the same occur?
You're talking about the addon Flashgot, right? Disabling it does not help.
therube wrote:Which Synology do you have? Like it? Easy to configure? Can it do FTP?
It's a pretty "old" Synology DS107. Nonetheless they provide updates regularly and it offers tons of features, including FTP-server. The hibernation on the other hand causes a lot of trouble (e.g. a booting Win7 computer with default configuration ends hibernation etc) See http://www.synology.com/enu/products/index.php. They have a forum, too.
Giorgio Maone wrote:Does your NAS respond on your WAN IP too, at least from your LAN? If it does, this may be http://noscript.net/abe/wan
Some services do respond on the WAN IP (FTP server does, web interface does not), so I suppose it does in general.
http://noscript.net/abe/wan wrote:This new feature, enabled by default, can be disabled at any time by clearing the NoScript Options|Advanced|ABE|WAN IP ∈ LOCAL checkbox.
As soon as this checkbox is cleared, the NAS continues to sleep. Thanks for your help.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Post Reply