[Invalid] False Positives?

Ask for help about NoScript, no registration needed to post
SB

[Invalid] False Positives?

Post by SB »

There are certain adult sites that I visit that are being blocked by No Script on Firefox. But when I test them with Chromium (Linux) they run fine.

For instance, Guys With IPhones is now completely blocked with a red attack site warning page. But when I open it in Chromium, there's no problem.

When I go to certain adult blogs, the search box is blocked saying there is some fake thing there. But again, in Chromium it is not.

Can someone explain this, please?
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100723 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.8
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: False Positives?

Post by therube »

You sure that's not Firefox aka Google warning you (at least on the iphone site).

(No problem loading the site here. Don't use FF, & so that FF/Google "bad site" database does not exist for me.)

Google & therefore Firefox, label that site as harmful.

Concerns About Web Search Results: Results labeled 'This site may harm your computer'
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0b5pre) Gecko/20100819 Firefox/3.0 SeaMonkey/2.1b1pre
Guest

Re: False Positives?

Post by Guest »

What doesn't make sense to me is if Google is labeling the site as harmful, why is it not showing up on Chromium which is Google owned and run?!

Also, if it does not show up for you on firefox, then why is it showing up for me? We are both using No Script. So why am I getting it and not you? It doesn't make sense.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100723 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.8
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: False Positives?

Post by therube »

> What doesn't make sense to me is if Google is labeling the site as harmful, why is it not showing up on Chromium

Wondered about that. But not familiar with Chrome. Would expect it use the same database, but who knows?

Do a Google search for your page. You will see that Google lists it as harmful. (That's how I know about it.)

> if it does not show up for you on firefox

I don't use FF, I use SeaMonkey. SeaMonkey does not use that Google (whatever it's called, database thing) that FF uses & so SeaMonkey would never flag the site.


Start FF in -safe-mode (assume that would disable both NoScript & also the FF/Google database) & see if the site loads as expected for you. (But then according to Google, that would not be safe.)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0b5pre) Gecko/20100819 Firefox/3.0 SeaMonkey/2.1b1pre
Guest

Re: False Positives?

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:We are both using No Script. So why am I getting it and not you? It doesn't make sense.
I don't know why you'd suspect NoScript, because it does no such thing.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8
User avatar
therube
Ambassador
Posts: 7969
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: [Invalid] False Positives?

Post by therube »

NoScript does do this (below) & it was this that I initially thought the OP was posting about (but now I don't think it is the issue).

FAQ: 3.17 Q: Some pages display the little NoScript icon with one or more links on its left side. I thought this could be disabled by unchecking "Show placeholder", but it's still shown... How do I make it go away?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100701 SeaMonkey/2.0.6
Post Reply