Hello!
Just want to know why nosc doesn't help in this case?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568564
[MOOT] XSUH & noscript
[MOOT] XSUH & noscript
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.3) Gecko/20100401 SUSE/3.6.4-1.1 Firefox/3.6.4
-
Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9524
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: XSUH & noscript
It does help, actually.
The "attack" doesn't work, unless you had previously whitelisted the attacker's page.
The "attack" doesn't work, unless you had previously whitelisted the attacker's page.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3
Re: XSUH & noscript
Dumb exploits won't work in SeaMonkey. Needs to learn how to properly sniff a browseralert('Please use Mozilla Firefox');
.Gecko is Gecko
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4
Re: XSUH & noscript
hm... looks my fault. sorry.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.3) Gecko/20100401 SUSE/3.6.4-1.1 Firefox/3.6.4