[deleted]

Bug reports and enhancement requests
Post Reply
Nate
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:21 pm

[deleted]

Post by Nate »

[deleted]
Last edited by Nate on Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100216 Fedora/3.5.8-1.fc11 Firefox/3.5.8
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9524
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: Embeddings restrictions not working correctly...?

Post by Giorgio Maone »

I'm unable to reproduce.
Could you export your configuration (NoScript Options|Export) and send me it, then use the "Reset" button and check "Forbid IFrames"?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6
Nate
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:21 pm

[deleted]

Post by Nate »

[deleted]
Last edited by Nate on Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100216 Fedora/3.5.8-1.fc11 Firefox/3.5.8
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9524
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: Embeddings restrictions not working correctly...?

Post by Giorgio Maone »

Nate wrote:Well, I hardly changed any settings since I'm still experimenting, so I messed around a little and found that un/checking the "Scripts Globally Allowed (Dangerous)" option makes the (other) difference. This seems to be a bug, since i/frames are not scripts.
This is the intended behavior. The label says "scripts" because historically NoScript started as a mean to deal with scripts, but that option actually causes NoScript to treat as "trusted" all the sources (i.e. it goes in blacklist mode), therefore embedding restrictions apply only if you checked the "to whitelisted sites as well" option.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6
Post Reply