[RESOLVED] Pages Not Fully Loading with Version 1.9.9.12

[GµårÐïåñ]

Please check latest development build 1.9.9.14 and let me know.

Thanks Giorgio but what exactly are you modifying because this has not been a problem for me and given how many users we have the amount reported is such a tiny piece of it, now that is not saying it is not happening, but we don't have any 100% empirical data that is NoScript. I just don't want you spending so much time tweaking a code that could possibly become broken as a result of something that may "seem" like its related but it is not for sure.

As I said before, I have had my share of random issues but its no reproducible consistently, so the causal link between them is not established yet, at least not directly. I would sooner assume that someone double clicked the link and caused a loop back or a broken http connection than to assume its NoScript preventing it. Just saying, also if someone has configured ABE in a potentially incorrect manner, it could serve as an obstacle too, so anyone have anything in there?

[Hardhead]

Thank you!!!

I'm using 1.9.9.14 version and http://www.msn.com/ is now loading properly.

Regards,
Hardhead

[FattysGoneWild]

Why it is effecting some and not others is beyond me. I have been a noscript user since day 1. This was surely a NS issue. I disabled NS and it worked fine. Enable it again. Page loading issues. Some sites not loading at all. The latest dev. build has fixed the problem for me and smooth as butter again. Since releases are frequent. Maybe people are just holding out for a update or rolled back to the previous version. Or simply do not want to bother reporting it. That could be why the uproar is not to big right now.

Please check latest development build 1.9.9.14 and let me know.

Thanks Giorgio but what exactly are you modifying because this has not been a problem for me and given how many users we have the amount reported is such a tiny piece of it, now that is not saying it is not happening, but we don't have any 100% empirical data that is NoScript. I just don't want you spending so much time tweaking a code that could possibly become broken as a result of something that may "seem" like its related but it is not for sure.

As I said before, I have had my share of random issues but its no reproducible consistently, so the causal link between them is not established yet, at least not directly. I would sooner assume that someone double clicked the link and caused a loop back or a broken http connection than to assume its NoScript preventing it. Just saying, also if someone has configured ABE in a potentially incorrect manner, it could serve as an obstacle too, so anyone have anything in there?

[Giorgio Maone]

Why it is effecting some and not others is beyond me.

Notice that the main problem here has been that it's not affecting me (the developer), i.e. I couldn't reproduce the symptoms.
I guessed a certain change could help, and it did indeed, but I couldn't actually test anything because everything was fine and dandy with .12 for me (and many other people, I guess).
However I'm trying to push .14 out in auto-update ASAP, since I can't say how many people are affected, not knowing the triggering con-cause.
BTW, are you using any proxy or personal firewall (e.g. Zone Alarm)?

[Fuzzi0n]

I had this problem with 1.9.9.12 but I went back to .11 and it fixed it. And I'm using Zone Alarm Extream.

[Tom T.]

...Notice that the main problem here has been that it's not affecting me (the developer), i.e. I couldn't reproduce the symptoms....
BTW, are you using any proxy or personal firewall (e.g. Zone Alarm)?

FWIW, I use ZoneAlarm Free, and have had no problems at all with either .12, .13, or .14, though I've had the latter for only a few hours.

I also notice that there is no noscript.checkHijackings in about:config, so I assume this feature is F3+ only?
Would thinking of any differences between F2 and F3 help you find the cause?

[Tom T.]

I had this problem with 1.9.9.12 but I went back to .11 and it fixed it. And I'm using Zone Alarm Extream.

I see two differences between Free and Extreme.

Advanced Download
Protection New, Exclusive
Analyzes browser downloads in three unique ways before they can infect your PC and warns if they are malicious.

Virtual Browsing Exclusive
Allows users to surf with full protection against malicious software like drive-by downloads and browser exploits

The latter sounds similar to Sandboxie, though I haven't investigated ZA's virtualization program, but I do know that for updates, I must either use an unsandboxed browser or go through a rather involved process to get the update and then move it from the sandbox to an admin-privileged browser.

Hope this might give a clue.

[FattysGoneWild]

No proxy. Running Comodo CIS but only the firewall and D+ portion. Never been an issue with NoScripts. I even rolled back to .11 and it was fine. I was not even going to try the dev. .14 build because I always wait for official releases. But said what the heck and it fixed the problem for me. You make it and are stumped as well. Don't know what it could be. If you are doing a emergency push of .14 Is it the same as the dev. build or will it need to be uninstalled and then re-download through the internal update?

Why it is effecting some and not others is beyond me.

Notice that the main problem here has been that it's not affecting me (the developer), i.e. I couldn't reproduce the symptoms.
I guessed a certain change could help, and it did indeed, but I couldn't actually test anything because everything was fine and dandy with .12 for me (and many other people, I guess).
However I'm trying to push .14 out in auto-update ASAP, since I can't say how many people are affected, not knowing the triggering con-cause.
BTW, are you using any proxy or personal firewall (e.g. Zone Alarm)?

[Tom T.]

If you are doing a emergency push of .14 Is it the same as the dev. build ...

Yes, the official release through Mozilla Updates will be the same as the dev. build, else it would have a different version number.

or will it need to be uninstalled and then re-download through the internal update?

You do not need to uninstall the dev build and re-download. If .14 is working for you, then you are good.

[GµårÐïåñ]

The "dev" builds ARE indeed final release builds, they just haven't been pushed out to AMO yet, that's the only difference. They are fully complied each time and packaged so they are the latest of the best code available. Don't hesitate.

[specialfx63]

Why it is effecting some and not others is beyond me.

Notice that the main problem here has been that it's not affecting me (the developer), i.e. I couldn't reproduce the symptoms.
I guessed a certain change could help, and it did indeed, but I couldn't actually test anything because everything was fine and dandy with .12 for me (and many other people, I guess).
However I'm trying to push .14 out in auto-update ASAP, since I can't say how many people are affected, not knowing the triggering con-cause.
BTW, are you using any proxy or personal firewall (e.g. Zone Alarm)?

Thank you Giorgio! Everything works fine with the latest release. All pages finish loading. I forgot to mention yesterday that I do run the free edition of ZoneAlarm on this particular machine. We do appreciate the hard work you put into this software. It helps make the Net a better place.
Thanks again, it was a good guess!

[Notas Badoff]

Thank you! Updated to .14 and http://www.cnn.com worked. Good news from you! Now for the bad news from CNN ?

[user]

not sure if this is the right place to do this.
just wanted to say thank you for fixing the bug that was stopping pages loading.
even thou you couldnt re-produce it,its still been fixed.
all pages work fine again.

hope ive not caused more work posting here.just didnt feel right not saying anything.
felt a bit like posting a hi-jack log asking for help then not not comming back if you kwim.

anyway thank you for your time and patince yesterday.
and obviously the new build.

best wishes.

[GµårÐïåñ]

Glad its working for everyone, so will mark this issue as resolved. Should something else surface, please let us know, preferably in a new topic.

[therube]

I just had this occur again, http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopi ... 492#p12492.

I was signed in to gmail - newsgroup. Don't think I actually loaded/opened up my mail?
Signed out, then went I signed back in at http://www.gmail.com/ with a different username.

At that point, I again got just what is pictured in the link.
(don't remember exact sequence, but...)
Opened the link again (Ctrl+Enter on the URL bar does it in SeaMonkey) into a new tab.
(don't recall if I needed to refresh the page or if it "opened" in the same manner again?)
But whether I refreshed or not, at least I was able to successfully have the page load.
And again the URL change from the pictured http://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1 to the (successfully displaying page) with the URL showing as http://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#inbox.

Nothing of consequence in Error Console. Running .14.