feedback

[noscriptuser22222222]

What is the deal with the mozilla addon page having an older version of Noscript? Wish they would get on the ball! Great product, thanks.


p

[Alan Baxter]

AMO hasn't finished reviewing the newer version yet. That's all. In the meantime AMO make it available here.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo ... rsions/722

[noscriptuser22222222]

Thanks for the link.I have the newest version.

p

[therube]

(Just to note, that page is extremely slow & resource intensive to open in Gecko 1.8.1. <Not a NoScript issue.>)

[Alan Baxter]

You're welcome.

Edit:

(Just to note, that page is extremely slow & resource intensive to open in Gecko 1.8.1. <Not a NoScript issue.>)

Yes. You're absolutely right. It took minutes at 100% CPU to load in Fx 2.0.0.20 on my 600 MHz PC. IE8 took a long time, but at least less than a minute. Opera and Fx 3.5.3 much better, with Firefox taking only 22 seconds. It's much quicker to check http://noscript.net/getit#devel for the latest version than the AMO page I referenced. I use both of the NoScript RSS update feeds to get timely, asynchronous notifications for all updates: http://noscript.net/feed?c=200&t=b and http://noscript.net/feed.