Is a large, persistent, storage-sync-v2.sqlite-wal an issue with NoScript (itself, more so then just a bug in Mozilla's sqlite implementation)?
As in, is there something NoScript should be doing specifically, that it might not be doing, or is it simply a general issue (that if fixed would result in [far] less sized files)?
Bugzilla: Bug 1813330 storage-sync-v2.sqlite-wal extension data never cleaned up
Each colored band, with exception, is an individual Profile.
The file dated 2024 is my current 115 ESR (uptime since 12/19/2023 & counting).
That 18 MB file is (most likely) from FF versions up to 115 ESR (when I most likely stopped using that Profile altogether).
Extensions:
NoScript
uBlock Origin
Firefox Color
Download Grab (which I didn't even recall that I had it installed)
(Without being scientific in any way, & without opening an sqlite GUI or sqlite.exe) I'm guess that the ONLY data in that file is repeated items relating to NoScript.
If I compress storage-sync-v2.sqlite-wal, it's size drops from 13 MB to 200 KB (so there is LOTS of repeatable data there).
ZIP 0 storage-sync-v2.sqlite-wal -> 0.zip = 200 KB
Is a large storage-sync-v2.sqlite-wal an issue with NoScript?
Is a large storage-sync-v2.sqlite-wal an issue with NoScript?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
- Giorgio Maone
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9481
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
- Location: Palermo - Italy
- Contact:
Re: Is a large storage-sync-v2.sqlite-wal an issue with NoScript?
Of course it's a Firefox bug.
No matter what it does, no WebExtension should be able to cause this problem, also because the storage API is completely agnostic to the actual sqlite-based back-end implementation.
No matter what it does, no WebExtension should be able to cause this problem, also because the storage API is completely agnostic to the actual sqlite-based back-end implementation.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:123.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/123.0
Re: Is a large storage-sync-v2.sqlite-wal an issue with NoScript?
(See also viewtopic.php?t=26900 . And you can also get rid of the storage-sync-v2.sqlite-wal and save on storage space by, after completely quitting Firefox, just open storage-sync-v2.sqlite in DB Browser for SQLite and close it without making any changes.)
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:122.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/122.0