Is there advantage to NoScript blocking Flash in FF > 68?
As it is, the only option for Flash in FF > 68 is "click to play" (aka "Ask") [or Off, altogether].
Will NoScript actually do more, actually blocking content download, or whatever, compared to FF's Ask?
As it is now, you're apt to get a double prompt on a Flash object (1 NoScript, 1 FF), http://inforss.mozdev.org/index.html.
Is there advantage to NoScript blocking Flash
Is there advantage to NoScript blocking Flash
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.5
Re: Is there advantage to NoScript blocking Flash
Last I checked, Firefox's click-to-play was per-site, not per-object.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
-
- Master Bug Buster
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 7:37 am
Re: Is there advantage to NoScript blocking Flash
NoScript doesn't block Flash per se, it blocks objects. Not sure if there is any easy and reliable way to detect if object is in fact Flash...
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0
Re: Is there advantage to NoScript blocking Flash
I don't see an "easy" advantage for NS to block flash
anyway, recent versions of Firefox alone can handle the flash blocking
anyway, recent versions of Firefox alone can handle the flash blocking
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/76.0.3809.46 Safari/537.36